Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
Since the parser is used in many places, we should still keep the original
way to pass conf.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
can we fix the active session problem? e.g. set active session in
`SparkSession.sql`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79348/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
**[Test build #79348 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79348/testReport)**
for PR 18568 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
Will merge this after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18567 is merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
That's an unfortunate case. Sorry for missing this. :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
Me too. Since setting active sessions does not work in all the cases, I
believe we need to revert both PRs and then revisit them later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
@gatorsmile .
If then, I'm wondering the reason why SBT with Hadoop-2.6 always survives
with the same configuration. I think it's not dependent on Hadoop.
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18568
**[Test build #79348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79348/testReport)**
for PR 18568 at commit
11 matches
Mail list logo
