Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220524558
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220523237
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220511333
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220511331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220511206
**[Test build #58935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58935/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220501865
**[Test build #58935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58935/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220501720
@hvanhovell Thanks. I have address your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63915441
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCommandSuite.scala
---
@@ -269,6 +270,81 @@ class HiveCommandSuite extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63915128
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,55 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63915008
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,55 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63914894
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,55 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220263980
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220263982
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220263742
**[Test build #58853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58853/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220246020
**[Test build #58853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58853/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63832125
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63814999
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220205653
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220205657
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220205631
**[Test build #58833 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58833/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220204527
@hvanhovell Thanks. I have address your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220204385
**[Test build #58833 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58833/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63810569
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63809072
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220174569
@lianhuiwang this looks pretty good. What is your take on the atomicity of
the truncate operation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63792095
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63791716
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63791491
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63791413
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -271,6 +274,54 @@ case class LoadData(
}
/**
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63788452
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -351,6 +351,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#discussion_r63788383
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -351,6 +351,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220167424
cc @hvanhovell for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220005341
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220005343
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220005100
**[Test build #58772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58772/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-220003377
**[Test build #2991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2991/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-219987072
**[Test build #58772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58772/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170#issuecomment-219987019
**[Test build #2991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2991/consoleFull)**
for PR 13170 at commit
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13170
[SPARK-15335] [SQL] Implement TRUNCATE TABLE Command
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Like TRUNCATE TABLE Command in Hive, TRUNCATE TABLE is also supported by
Hive.
40 matches
Mail list logo
