Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17652
thanks, merging to 2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r111717917
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -422,40 +422,62 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596#discussion_r111721093
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -154,18 +154,22 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r111722945
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,37 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17620#discussion_r111723278
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
state =
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111713040
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,22 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111716155
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
@allengeorge yea, we could there. But, I think we should first make sure
about how to fix this issue. I'm not sure that the approach of this pr is the
best. cc: @gatorsmile
---
If your project is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596#discussion_r111721127
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -154,18 +154,22 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75850/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75850/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75851 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75851/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17657
[TEST][MINOR] Replace repartitionBy with distribute in
CollapseRepartitionSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace non-existent `repartitionBy` with
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17656
@squito do you have an opinion?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655#discussion_r111724069
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -114,14 +114,14 @@ class SessionCatalog(
*
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
seems this breaks python accumulator anyone know how python accumulator
works?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111712646
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655#discussion_r111713236
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -2295,5 +2295,27 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655#discussion_r111713226
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -2295,5 +2295,27 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17656
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17657
**[Test build #75852 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75852/testReport)**
for PR 17657 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r111719916
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -422,40 +422,62 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596#discussion_r111722114
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -154,18 +154,22 @@ abstract class AccumulatorV2[IN, OUT] extends
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17656
[SPARK-20354][CORE][REST-API]/api/v1/applicationsâ return sparkUser is
null in REST API.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When I request access to the 'http:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15398
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650#discussion_r111716305
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/BooleanSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -160,4 +166,12 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17646#discussion_r111717028
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -1202,15 +1203,25 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17646
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111719111
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,22 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
I'd be interested to know if this resolves the issue, and the only real way
is to merge it. It's not wrong, but it is hacky. That said I don't have a
better idea at the moment.
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75851 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75851/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75851/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user redsanket opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
[SPARK-20355] Add per application spark version on the history server
headerpage
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark Version for a specific application is not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75853/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
Yes... I hope anyone is able to reproduce this by the steps I did -
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17477#issuecomment-294094092 or confirm I
did this wrong.
I am fine with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75853/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17647
**[Test build #3663 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3663/testReport)**
for PR 17647 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655#discussion_r111781782
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -114,14 +114,14 @@ class SessionCatalog(
*
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
I am adding more tests right now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111711655
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650#discussion_r111716124
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,11 @@ object BooleanSimplification
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
**[Test build #75854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75854/testReport)**
for PR 17557 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17657
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17657
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lvdongr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17620#discussion_r111732189
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
state =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75855/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
**[Test build #75854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75854/testReport)**
for PR 17557 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17647
**[Test build #3663 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3663/testReport)**
for PR 17647 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75853/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17657
**[Test build #75852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75852/testReport)**
for PR 17657 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111730448
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user ptkool commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650#discussion_r111733014
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/BooleanSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -160,4 +166,12 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
FWIW, I at least checked this overrides the dependency (after manually
mismatching the versions between pom and sbt) if I haven't done something wrong.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r111734780
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -133,36 +135,53 @@ private[spark] class HighlyCompressedMapStatus
private
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75854/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75855/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75855 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75855/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
hi @jerryshao good points. First, we should probably move this discussion
to jira so its more visible -- feel free to open two issues for these if you
want, or first discuss on dev@. (Sorry its my
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
+1 on what @felixcheung said -- It'll be good to have more tests in
test_Serde.R. Other than that the change looks fine
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
**[Test build #75856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75856/testReport)**
for PR 17658 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
merged to master. thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r111764966
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,37 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75858/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17625
**[Test build #75857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75857/testReport)**
for PR 17625 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r111765227
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,37 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75858/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75858 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75858/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
**[Test build #75859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75859/testReport)**
for PR 17557 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r111767880
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,37 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Removed the failing SPARK-10548 test and rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75856/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658
**[Test build #75856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75856/testReport)**
for PR 17658 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17625
**[Test build #75857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75857/testReport)**
for PR 17625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17625
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540#discussion_r111766089
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLExecution.scala ---
@@ -39,6 +39,32 @@ object SQLExecution {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17625
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75857/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17652
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
**[Test build #75860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75860/testReport)**
for PR 17540 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17646#discussion_r111768721
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -1202,15 +1203,25 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655#discussion_r111770874
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -114,14 +114,14 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17663
Yea, I just had to note this just in case someone refers this as a
reference. Thanks for bearing with me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495#discussion_r111860131
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -143,12 +156,26 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17662
I like it, I'm going to leave this a for a bit and see if anyone has any
comments overnight :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17667
**[Test build #75879 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75879/testReport)**
for PR 17667 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17656
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17656
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75870/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17656
**[Test build #75870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75870/testReport)**
for PR 17656 at commit
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
