On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:07 -0600, inode0 wrote:
On 12/19/06, MJang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
One more yum related question - just took a look at the RHUP304 course
outline, and that includes coverage of yum repositories.
That suggests to me that Red Hat will encourage the use
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:45 -0600, Stanley, Jon wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sharpe, Sam J
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:05 AM
To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases
discussion mailing
On 6 Dec 2006, at 08:19, kalyana raman wrote:
please tell me the location of rhel5-beta2 iso image file.
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/beta/RHEL5-Beta2/
___
rhelv5-beta-list mailing list
rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com
Ummm... Branding?
They're not called Blue Hat you know...
On 30 Nov 2006, at 19:23, Jack Neely wrote:
Folks,
UmmmI've been told over and over again by usability folks at
Red Hat
and elsewhere how bad it is to have the desktop red. In fact rhgb
has a
red background which made me
I'm an enterprise user with 1500 RedHat desktops. RedHat does meet my
demands.
I would say that Wireless support is not even in the top twenty most
important things to an Enterprise user because our machine density
would make the speed of any wireless network slow to a crawl. With a
Possibly to leave it would create a support ambiguity.
If something is broken, is that because of the kernel module or the
userland tools? If there is no kernel module, then anything to do with
that hardware becomes by default not a RedHat issue.
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 16:09 +0100, Grant
On 19 Sep 2006, at 11:33, Jeff Needle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd just like to echo a me too on this subject, just do you
know you
are not going insane.
I'm glad you have, I don't recall seeing my original (until now), let
alone any discussion
I checked
