On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:34 AM, greg wrote:
I know that many people are disgruntled about the lack of a openjdk java
plugin in RHEL5, but I'm at a bit of a loss about something related. I
could have sworn that EPEL had the plugin with their RPMs before RH
released their RPMs. So did EPEL
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Tangren, Bill wrote:
2) can the email be recovered? [the server has not been turned off, so the
partition is still being written to.]
Normally this is when you go to backups. :)
http://www.google.com/search?q=linux%20file%20recovery
IIRC dovecot uses maildir by
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
machine. So common sense say's to run the processes in virtual machines to
make more use of the machines as they stand. I'm familiar with vmware server
1, but noticed that vmware server 2 allows you to nominate cpu's for virtual
machines
Andy Kannberg wrote:
I would like to determine the RedHat version during a kickstart in a
pre-script.
uname?
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
2009/3/23 Andy Kannberg :
Uname does not give the version. It does give a kernelversion (uname -i)
though. But that's not what I am looking for.
Yes, I was thinking of a hardcoded list like
EL5.2==2.6.18-128.el5
or whatever
___
rhelv5-list mailing
Is it possible to use mk-rescueimage (from anaconda-runtime) to build a
rescue CD with the latest kernel? Does anyone have a script to do this?
Seems like it should be straightforward but I can't seem to get it to work.
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
You can use Fedora (probably Fedora 10) or oVirt of course.
The state of the lFarkas.org repo was briefly discussed on centos-virt too:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2009-February/000876.html
Or wait (a few months ?) for the 5.4 public beta.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
It seems the portmapper (starting up prior to dovecot) handed out port 995
to rpc.statd (lsof and rpcinfo confirmed this). Subsequent attempts to
start dovecot resulted in the same message.
This also came up on the recent portmap vs cups
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
I enjoy most of the messages on these mailing lists, but I find they are
sparse and the discussions never reach much depth. I am curious, what
additional resources, if any, do the members of these lists engage for Red
Hat technical
In the recent why avahi thread, I mentioned that it would
be nice to have tools for a useful minimal install. Well, I
just ran across the fact that it's already in Fedora 10:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApplianceTools
For example this guy built a JBoss AS5 + jboss-rails
appliance into
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Nick Jennings wrote:
I've been running system updates routinely to keep up with the latest
security updates. However I've been running into problems where the updates
over-ride my existing configuration in /etc ! very bad!
The only time I've seen this happen
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Kenton Brede wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Tris Hoar wrote:
That begs the question as to why is CUPS installed on a server OS by
default? We have never had cause to print form any of the servers and if we
do we know how to install CUPS ourselves.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:59 PM, t35t0r wrote:
Anyone know the how to denny root access in Graphical login
Wouldn't you also want to block the user from being able to login via
the console?
Good tips, but maybe he just doesn't want newbies logging in as root.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:34 PM, vu pham wrote:
I am trying the tool opcontrol as explained here
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-oprofile-configuring.html
but I cannot find the package debuginfoas told in the above link to
install.
It
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I basically put the couple of days after a release to be 'dead' space
and if its important enough for my 'customers' not to have that
problem I budget in a satellite. Sometimes they will do it.. and
sometimes they won't.
I can see
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Greg Swift wrote:
I am installing as minimal of a set of packages as our internal
requirements and dependancies allow, which ends up being about 608 packages
if installed from a x86_64 only install tree. The second I point that same
I am curious, is this sort
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:07 AM, solarflow99 wrote:
With the recent announcement on the redhat site, it sounds like xen is being
dropped after all thats been invested in it? I haven't used KVM myself, any
thoughts on it?
It's not being dropped. The Xen support in EL5 is not going anywhere.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM, dross wrote:
This appears to be a problem with NTFS file permission translation to the
Unix machine. Is there a Standard way to share files so that this does not
occur? Do the Unix for Windows tools provide a fix for this? Is this a bug
in mount.cifs that
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:01 AM, carlopmart wrote:
Maybe this thread it is off-topic, but I will to known what virtualization
platforms (Xen, KVM, VMWare, etc...) can we manage from oVirt?? ESX 3.x and
ESXi will be included??
You know, you can download the dev version:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
I have tried to use RH support for actual RHEL problems, filing Bugzilla
entries only for Fedora problems (or for RFE-type RHEL things).
However, my experience with RH support has been rather poor; my boss
asked so why do we pay for this
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Broekman, Maarten wrote:
If you have a completely scripted installation, is there any need for
the firstboot RPMs (firstboot and firstboot-tui)? Is there any reason
to keep them installed after the system is built and configured?
I'm wondering because these
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Tom Sightler wrote:
RHEL4 to RHEL5) then it's actually 12 of the 14 support tickets that
were caused by regressions from previous versions.
This is a very interesting discussion. I work at an edu and so I
normally use public channels like this mailing list or
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Corey Kovacs wrote:
Some of my users came to me today asking where xemacs went after a
RHEL5.2 install. I didn't have a good answer for them except that
someone seems to have decided that in RHEL, xemacs is dead. I am
curious who made that decision and why? I
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Harrison, Jonathan wrote:
I also feel there needs to be a server profile. This is coming from
someone who personally uses Gentoo, and there is nothing better than
installing a system and being able to count on both hands and feet the
number of packages that
On Friday 11 July 2008 06:39:53 am Masopust, Christian wrote:
has anybody of you done a upgrade of RHEL4 to RHEL5 without booting
form DVD?
Here is a short script I use to automatically add the appropriate files and grub
entry to boot anaconda from an existing grub (for example EL4).
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Jay Turner wrote:
Anyway, I would like to take this opportunity to offer a side trip with
this thread. What do people need/want in RHEL6?
FreeIPA looks very nice, though of course I'd like more audit
functionality. I really would like it as a drop-in
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Ken Snider wrote:
On 9-Jul-08, at 1:32 PM, Jay Turner wrote:
Anyway, I would like to take this opportunity to offer a side trip with
this thread. What do people need/want in RHEL6?
Many of these are installed for LSB compliance, but things like cups,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:02 AM, David Rees wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
I start to think whether these kernels are indeed being all used to
the extend of justifying full kmdl support. Maybe it would make sense
to keep the full last series (2.6.18-92* above) and
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:28 PM, solarflow99 wrote:
it seems hdparm is not as useful as I thought then, I wonder if you have any
preferred programs for disk IO benchmarks? It still strikes me as
surprising that the results could be so drastically different, the raid
controllers were not the
I have some 3ware controllers as well and while I can't say that they
are the best (performance is horrible in many cases) I never lost any
data unless I had two dead disks in RAID5.
Are you really sure about this? Most benchmarks I saw indicated otherwise.
Seconded. I've always been
Here is a virtualization link dump from my notes:
Start here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki//Tools/Xen
http://www.redhat.com/docs/
Provisioning Linux Simplified with Cobbler
http://openbysource.blogspot.com/2007/04/provisioning-linux-simplified-with.html
Building a tiny Centos 4 installation
as I have found the LDAP server will not start quickly as it looks for the
LDAP server when it starts! (I am guessing but I think it looks for the user
ldap, which is in /etc/passwd, but carries on looking for ldap anyway even
though the use has already been found).
I have this in my
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Simon Jolle wrote:
I am currently employed by a big enterprise. Thank to our procurement
department we pay only fractional amount of the list price.
Are there special resellers for SMBs? Can you recommend a company?
We have used dlt.com
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:12 AM, J E wrote:
The question is what do you gain by removing it? Are you also
removing perl, gcc, sendmail and the like? Those are bigger worries if
someone gets in.
There are several advantages to Just Enough OS, for example if
you are deploying a few thousand
On Jan 26, 2008 3:05 AM, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
You may find this script I wrote useful:
http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/code/monitor_3w_raid.py
Nice, I've got a local one with less error handling too. There
really should be a tool that could monitor the most common
hardware raid types by
On Jan 26, 2008 3:23 AM, wolf2k5 wrote:
What would be a way to obtain a RHEL5 minimal install equivalent to RHEL4?
It's not simple, though it can be done with kickstart. It seems like
the EL5 approach is a much bigger minimal without calling it
that, especially because of
There was a post not
On Jan 25, 2008 12:33 PM, Tim Utschig wrote:
I can't say for RHEL 5. On RHEL 4 I have just a single 3w_9xxx
module loaded. Maybe some udev script needs to be modified.
At least last time I checked, smartctl/smartd itself actually creates
the /dev/tw* devices based on major/minor in
Really nice table:
Vulnerability and threat mitigation features in Red Hat Enterprise
Linux and Fedora
http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/200801070918.html
There are links to explanations of what most features are (glibc
pointer encryption)
and also happens to list each product's release date.
On Dec 14, 2007 8:27 AM, Roger Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have upgraded several of my Dell servers to EL5 from 3 and 4 and am
noticing that on the EL5 machines the automounts fail the first time with
so such file or directory but then they will mount. This is the only
change I made
Hello, does
yum grouplist
work for anyone on EL5 with all updates? It doesn't for me, and I'm
trying to figure out if it's my setup, our local satellite server, or
just borked.
Other group commands like groupinstall are also broken. Works fine
on Fedora and a CentOS5 system.
On Dec 5, 2007 9:28 AM, Peter Sobisch wrote:
1) very often some processes on the clients complain about missing
files, which are definitively there.
EL5 has a new version of autofs, you may need to up your automount
timeout period. I have DEFAULT_TIMEOUT=300 in
/etc/sysconfig/autofs on our
On Dec 3, 2007 2:53 AM, John Haxby wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this? We have a developer license and
this morning all three of our RHEL5 development systems lost their
entitlement so we can no longer apply updates. Our remaining systems
all all still entitled to updates, it's
Hello, I know I won't get a definite release date for
RHEL5.1 but I've got a shipment arriving in a couple
of days and would really like to kickstart from a 5.1
tree instead of 5.0 as there were some timeout issues
with this hardware with the 5.0 anaconda.
Can anyone give a don't hold your breath
On 5/14/07, Joshua Miller wrote:
I would also suggest adding the following line to your /etc/ldap.conf,
which will prevent LDAP group lookups on root and the ldap user and allow
your machine to boot faster and allow you to login as root when your LDAP
server is down:
On 4/30/07, Tom Sightler wrote:
I think it's likely there is significant interest here. Dell has long
provided a DKMS enabled ieee1394 module for RHEL4.
I didn't know that. I should have been paying more attention
on the linux-precision list and saved myself some trouble.
Looks like the RPM
On 12/7/06, Paul Krizak wrote:
I've done many many (hundreds) of installs, and they're all slow. I've
jumped into the shell during an installation to try and locate the
source of the slowness and have failed.
I've noticed it being slower but I have (perhaps wrongly) assumed
that it was due to
On 11/30/06, John Summerfield wrote:
I maintain a RHL 7.3 system which I plan to try to upgrade to ...
something. RHEL5 (or a clone) would be nice.
I hope you mean upgrade in the generic sense of a
reinstall/restore data.
I appreciate that there will be problems (such as the need to find
On 11/16/06, Jay Turner wrote:
See, if I told you that I would have to suffer wet-noodle treatment here
at the office and it's wet enough outside as it is (we're having a huge
storm in Raleigh, NC.) Patience is a virtue.
It's bad everywhere. It's Seattle's wettest November on record
On 9/15/06, Duke, Michael wrote:
I'm trying to build a Xen guest on a newly installed RHEL5 Beta 1 system.
I'm using the method I've previously used - the xenguest-install.py script.
I get as far as the package selection being completed in the text-mode
installer before it errors out as follows:
49 matches
Mail list logo
