Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Vanco Backup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting experience today. I was asked to install a number of servers
with hostnames that started with numbers - but the installer would not
proceed. I could, of course, change then after the
Thanks for the comments all. I suspected it was an RFC issue, but it was a
bit late to check the Interwebs.
Should one not exist, I may open a Bugzilla ticket (and refer to the Fedora
fix) just to see what opinion is on changing it.
Don
Hire me - dammit!
http://ocnav.com/
I'm trying to utilize %include Kickstart directive:
% include /install/packages-list.txt
Inside of packages-list.txt is %packages directive with a list of @groups
and -packages like this:
%packages
@core
@base
device-mapper-multipath
-nss-tools
-nss_db
-acpid
snip
Problem is it doesn't work.
I'm trying to utilize %include Kickstart directive:
% include /install/packages-list.txt
Inside of packages-list.txt is %packages directive with a list of
@groups and -packages like this:
%packages
@core
@base
device-mapper-multipath
-nss-tools
-nss_db
-acpid
snip
Problem is it
You have to have /install/packages-list.txt available to the local machine.
I have to do:
%pre
mkdir /nfs/ks
mount -t nfs -o nolock,ro server:/kickstart/stuff/includes /nfs/ks
and then I include
/nfs/ks/package-list
Others on the list use wget in the %pre environment to pull down the
Hi List,
We frequently have problems connecting RHEL to our HP SAN.
I already tried with support but got different answers any time I asked.
:-(
So, what are your experiences? We want to start a new server with the
followin setup:
* HP DL380 Server
* 2 QL2400 HBAs (HP branded)
* HP EVA8100
I have a similar configuration using DL360's. So far it's worked
great. THere are basically three options that I'll consider.
1. HP branded qlogic drivers setup for driver based failover which
coalesces the device paths into a single path.
2. HP bradned qlogic drivers used along with
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Vanco Backup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the comments all. I suspected it was an RFC issue, but it was a
bit late to check the Interwebs.
Should one not exist, I may open a Bugzilla ticket (and refer to the Fedora
fix) just to see what opinion is on
Vanco Backup wrote:
Thanks for the comments all. I suspected it was an RFC issue, but it was a
bit late to check the Interwebs.
Should one not exist, I may open a Bugzilla ticket (and refer to the Fedora
fix) just to see what opinion is on changing it.
If there be any remaining doubt, run
