Re: [rhelv5-list] RHEL 5.5 and creeping dependencies

2010-03-31 Thread Stainforth, Matthew (SD/DS)
Is there any value in the redhat-lsb package - does anything actually need it? redhat-lsb has always pulled in cups on servers, and now with RHEL5.5, cups pulls in poppler, which pulls in gtk2, some X libraries, and an icon theme. Just what I wanted on a mail server or a DNS/RADIUS

Re: [rhelv5-list] DS4300: high load in case of large writes

2010-03-31 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:34:26AM +0200, Jiri Novosad wrote: On 27.3.2010 23:21, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:54:38PM +0100, vinc...@cojot.name wrote: Hello Jiri, The high load may be caused by I/O wait (check with sar -u). At any case, 30mb/s seems a little

[rhelv5-list] Conflict between RHEL 5.5 and EPEL repos with talloc/samba3x

2010-03-31 Thread Rich Graves
To possibly save other people the time I wasted... Fedora EPEL (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) provides talloc 2. If you install the new-in-5.5 samba3x RPMs, which are necessary for compatibility with current Microsoft clients and servers, they require RHEL 5.5's build of talloc 1, which

Re: [rhelv5-list] Update routing infos

2010-03-31 Thread Rainer Traut
Am 25.03.2010 15:10, schrieb Brian Long: Can you not just run ifup on the interface and it will add just the routes that are missing? You'll get some RT_NETLINK errors for those routes that already exist, but the new routes will be added. Yes this works, thank you. Rainer

Re: [rhelv5-list] Conflict between RHEL 5.5 and EPEL repos with talloc/samba3x

2010-03-31 Thread delhage
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 15:35, Rich Graves rgra...@carleton.edu wrote: To possibly save other people the time I wasted... Fedora EPEL (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) provides talloc 2. If you install the new-in-5.5 samba3x RPMs, which are necessary for compatibility with current

Re: [rhelv5-list] absolute minimum package list (was RHEL 5.5 and creeping dependencies)

2010-03-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:06 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Susan Baur su...@cdl.edu wrote: This thread leads me to ask, is there any guidance by RedHat or others on what the absolute minimum package set is for a RHEL 5.4 server. It seems as if the @base

Re: [rhelv5-list] absolute minimum package list (was RHEL 5.5 and creeping dependencies)

2010-03-31 Thread Jerrido, Richard W
-Original Message- From: rhelv5-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:rhelv5-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Stephen John Smoogen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:21 AM To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] absolute minimum package

[rhelv5-list] RHEL 6 beta soon?

2010-03-31 Thread Brian Wheeler
It sounds that way...finally! http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3873916/Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux-55-Released-RHEL-6-Coming-Soon.htm --- The new Red Hat (NYSE:RHT) release takes advantage of the latest Intel and AMD processors as well as advancements in virtualization and Windows