Hi Morgan,
Thanks for your quick response, that makes sense.
I have observed that the output of free declined as the following smoothly:
!201 $ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 15925 14423 1501 0 150
Not completely… usually the applications use some amount of shared memory too
(e.g. shared libraries which are loaded into memory only once for a number of
apps).
From: rhelv5-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:rhelv5-list-boun...@redhat.com] On
Behalf Of raid
On 20 September 2010 11:32, raid fifa raid_f...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
sorry for my puzzled email.
I mean used memory of free should be around equal to SUM of the values of
RES column from top cmd. Is that right? or my mis-understand?
In /proc/pid/smaps there are Shared_clean and Shared_dirty
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Also, sorry if this is a duplicate. I was having some email issues this
morning.
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
On 20/09/10 15:10, Gary Gatling wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Also, sorry if this is a duplicate. I was having some email issues this
morning.
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
___
rhelv5-list mailing
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Also, sorry if this is a duplicate. I was having some email issues this
morning.
Early this week according to:
On 20 September 2010 14:10, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
For what it's worth, any CVE id is a suitable bug alias for Red Hat's
bugzilla,
eg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3081
jch
Once upon a time, John Haxby j...@thehaxbys.co.uk said:
For what it's worth, any CVE id is a suitable bug alias for Red Hat's
bugzilla,
eg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3081
Does anybody know what the holdup is with releasing a fixed kernel? Per
the BZ, Red Hat has
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:08, Gary Gatling gsgat...@eos.ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
I do not believe RHEL-5 is suceptible to this bug. I could not get my
RHEL-5 x86_64 to 'root' but that does not mean I was doing it right.
Thanks,
Gary
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:47, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:08, Gary Gatling gsgat...@eos.ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
I do not believe RHEL-5 is suceptible to this bug. I could not get my
RHEL-5
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 09:08 -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
Gary,
I was concerned about this until I read this:
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9574
I downloaded and ran the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 13:06, Robert G. (Doc) Savage
dsav...@peaknet.net wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 09:08 -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
Gary,
I was concerned about this until I read
Once upon a time, Robert G. (Doc) Savage dsav...@peaknet.net said:
I was concerned about this until I read this:
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9574
I downloaded and ran the diagnose-2010-3081 binary on my RHEL55 server
and was relieved to see:
$ ./diagnose-2010-3081
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:06 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
I was concerned about this until I read this:
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9574
I downloaded and ran the diagnose-2010-3081 binary on my RHEL55 server
and was relieved to see:
$ ./diagnose-2010-3081
Hey guys.
I just compiled this:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Sep/268
on a 32 bit machine and indeed, RHEL 5 is affected. (The first exploit
code I saw over the weekend did not work but this one did) I compiled on
32 bit kernel and ran on 64 bit kernel (2.6.18-194.11.3.el5) and
On 20 September 2010 18:20, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, John Haxby j...@thehaxbys.co.uk said:
For what it's worth, any CVE id is a suitable bug alias for Red Hat's
bugzilla,
eg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3081
Does anybody know what
Once upon a time, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu said:
on a 32 bit machine and indeed, RHEL 5 is affected. (The first exploit
code I saw over the weekend did not work but this one did) I compiled on
32 bit kernel and ran on 64 bit kernel (2.6.18-194.11.3.el5) and got root.
scary. I've added
18 matches
Mail list logo
