Am Montag, den 20.09.2010, 12:47 -0600 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:08, Gary Gatling gsgat...@eos.ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
I do not believe RHEL-5 is suceptible to this bug. I could not get my
RHEL-5
Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list
Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] CVE-2010-3081
Am Montag, den 20.09.2010, 12:47 -0600 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:08, Gary Gatling gsgat...@eos.ncsu.edu
wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
I do
Gary Gatling wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
It is live on RHN as of late last night/early this morning:
RHSA-2010:0704.
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 09:19 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:18 -0400, Linda Wang wrote:
It is live on RHN as of late last night/early this morning:
RHSA-2010:0704.
Confirmed. I had to run 'yum update' twice for the kernel update to
As far as I understand, from what I read about the Ksplice tool, it that
it just tries to detect whether a back door was set up on a system (ie:
if it had already been compromised). I do not believe that the intent of
the program was not to test if the system was vulnerable.
Cale Fairchild
Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 09:19 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:18 -0400, Linda Wang wrote:
It is live on RHN as of late last night/early this morning:
RHSA-2010:0704.
Confirmed. I had to run 'yum update' twice for the
Hugh Brown wrote:
Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 09:19 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:18 -0400, Linda Wang wrote:
It is live on RHN as of late last night/early this morning:
RHSA-2010:0704.
Confirmed. I had to run 'yum update' twice for the
Cale Fairchild wrote:
Hugh Brown wrote:
Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 09:19 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:18 -0400, Linda Wang wrote:
It is live on RHN as of late last night/early this morning:
RHSA-2010:0704.
Confirmed. I had to run
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 09:51 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
I was expecting to see something similar to the output I got for
the F13 kernel:
$$$ Kernel release: 2.6.34.6-54.fc13.x86_64
!!! Could not find symbol: per_cpu__current_task
A symbol required
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Also, sorry if this is a duplicate. I was having some email issues this
morning.
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
On 20/09/10 15:10, Gary Gatling wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Also, sorry if this is a duplicate. I was having some email issues this
morning.
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
___
rhelv5-list mailing
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
___
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Also, sorry if this is a duplicate. I was having some email issues this
morning.
Early this week according to:
On 20 September 2010 14:10, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
For what it's worth, any CVE id is a suitable bug alias for Red Hat's
bugzilla,
eg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3081
jch
Once upon a time, John Haxby j...@thehaxbys.co.uk said:
For what it's worth, any CVE id is a suitable bug alias for Red Hat's
bugzilla,
eg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3081
Does anybody know what the holdup is with releasing a fixed kernel? Per
the BZ, Red Hat has
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:08, Gary Gatling gsgat...@eos.ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
I do not believe RHEL-5 is suceptible to this bug. I could not get my
RHEL-5 x86_64 to 'root' but that does not mean I was doing it right.
Thanks,
Gary
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:47, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:08, Gary Gatling gsgat...@eos.ncsu.edu wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
I do not believe RHEL-5 is suceptible to this bug. I could not get my
RHEL-5
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 09:08 -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
Gary,
I was concerned about this until I read this:
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9574
I downloaded and ran the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 13:06, Robert G. (Doc) Savage
dsav...@peaknet.net wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 09:08 -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
Will a new kernel be coming out soon to address CVE-2010-3081?
Thanks,
Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems
Gary,
I was concerned about this until I read
Once upon a time, Robert G. (Doc) Savage dsav...@peaknet.net said:
I was concerned about this until I read this:
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9574
I downloaded and ran the diagnose-2010-3081 binary on my RHEL55 server
and was relieved to see:
$ ./diagnose-2010-3081
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:06 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
I was concerned about this until I read this:
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9574
I downloaded and ran the diagnose-2010-3081 binary on my RHEL55 server
and was relieved to see:
$ ./diagnose-2010-3081
Hey guys.
I just compiled this:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Sep/268
on a 32 bit machine and indeed, RHEL 5 is affected. (The first exploit
code I saw over the weekend did not work but this one did) I compiled on
32 bit kernel and ran on 64 bit kernel (2.6.18-194.11.3.el5) and
On 20 September 2010 18:20, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, John Haxby j...@thehaxbys.co.uk said:
For what it's worth, any CVE id is a suitable bug alias for Red Hat's
bugzilla,
eg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-3081
Does anybody know what
Once upon a time, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu said:
on a 32 bit machine and indeed, RHEL 5 is affected. (The first exploit
code I saw over the weekend did not work but this one did) I compiled on
32 bit kernel and ran on 64 bit kernel (2.6.18-194.11.3.el5) and got root.
scary. I've added
24 matches
Mail list logo
