RE: [rhelv5-list] named/BIND data file syntax; moving from Solaris 9 to RHEL5

2008-03-27 Thread Griswold, Doug
: [rhelv5-list] named/BIND data file syntax;moving from Solaris 9 to RHEL5 We have been running Sun's Solaris 9 BIND (reported as version 8.3.3) for some years and are retiring the old hardware. However, we came across an apparent syntax issue in moving the RHEL's BIND. Here's a piece of the old

Re: [rhelv5-list] named/BIND data file syntax; moving from Solaris 9 to RHEL5

2008-03-27 Thread Matthew Snyder
Tim Evans wrote: mail is published as a CNAME in the outside world, since it is our main mail server. MX records must point to an A record. It usually works, but is against the RFCs. It probably isn't the cause of your problem but should be fixed. Random googling:

Re: [rhelv5-list] named/BIND data file syntax; moving from Solaris 9 to RHEL5

2008-03-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tim Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have been running Sun's Solaris 9 BIND (reported as version 8.3.3) for some years and are retiring the old hardware. However, we came across an apparent syntax issue in moving the RHEL's BIND. Here's a piece of the old

Re: [rhelv5-list] named/BIND data file syntax; moving from Solaris 9 to RHEL5

2008-03-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Matthew Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim Evans wrote: mail is published as a CNAME in the outside world, since it is our main mail server. MX records must point to an A record. It usually works, but is against the RFCs. It probably isn't the cause