We're using 3.5 SP1.
When I rewrite the interface as C# it is happy. I'll try playing with
the C++/CLI syntax a little and see if I can get it to work.
Colin
On Jan 18, 9:15 pm, Ayende Rahien aye...@ayende.com wrote:
what version of the runtime?if you write the same thing in C#, does it cause
In the fluent syntax is it possible to test whether a set only
property (not get method defined) is called. I am not too bothered
about the parameters being passed.
So far I have tried:
m_contactPresenter.ContactAdapter.AssertWasCalled(a = a.Names);
and
Expect.Call
:32 am, Colin Desmond colin.desm...@btopenworld.com
wrote:
We're using 3.5 SP1.
When I rewrite the interface as C# it is happy. I'll try playing with
the C++/CLI syntax a little and see if I can get it to work.
Colin
On Jan 18, 9:15 pm, Ayende Rahien aye...@ayende.com wrote:
what version
Excellent, thank you Phil.
Colin
On Jan 19, 3:52 pm, Phil philbol...@gmail.com wrote:
try: m_contactPresenter.ContactAdapter.AssertWasCalled(a = a.Names =
null);
On Jan 19, 3:03 am, Colin Desmond colin.desm...@btopenworld.com
wrote:
In the fluent syntax is it possible to test whether