Hi Claire
It sounds like you're using the Hill/Howard algorithm for quantification.
You just need to not put the details of the SiO2 phase you're using into
the summation.
This is equivalent to removing the ~90% attributed to the capillary, and
renormalising to 100%
Matthew
On Tue, 14 Nov
Hi all,
SRM 676a consisted of Baikowski CR1. This material is of a non-ideal
crystallite size distribution: quite broad with tales to large crystallites.
SRM 676b was custom made for us by Baikowski with a more uniform crystallite
size distribution in the 200 nm region. We are working on
Il 13/11/2023 18:35, Claire Emily Boronski ha scritto:
Dear Claire,
Make the sum of the remaining crystalline weight percentages to be 100%.
This is a rough, but simple, calculation.
Alternatively, measure an empty capillary and correct the raw data of
your mixture for such scattering (taking
Hi All,
I am trying to exclude the glass capillary from the weight percent calculations
in my Rietveld refinement. I modeled the glass capillary using a SiO2 CIF file
and made the crystallite size very small. The issue I am having now is that in
the weight percent calculation it is saying the
I would use any good single-crystal structure to model the pattern. Refine
cell params as necessary. I would use the NIST certificate as a starting
point, but not an end point.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 13:07, SMUDUT wrote:
> Thank you Matthew,
> Really appreciate!
> What about cell parameters and
