On Tue 19 Feb, Justin Fletcher wrote:
James Taylor wrote:
Please look at the problem before passing comment.
Still, it's empirical evidence; whilst it may be skewed there's
very little you can say from empirical evidence other than that
over the period... I said this.
I think your
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 19 Feb, Justin Fletcher wrote:
James Taylor wrote:
Please look at the problem before passing comment.
Still, it's empirical evidence; whilst it may be skewed there's
very little you can say from
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 07:27:03AM +, Richard Proctor wrote:
On Mon 18 Feb, James Taylor wrote:
On Fri 15 Feb, James Taylor wrote:
The rand() function as implemented in RISC OS Perl 1.13 for
the RiscPC is *not* uniform as it should be.
Err... It's been awfully quiet since I
On Mon 18 Feb, Richard Proctor wrote:
The rand function in the current riscos perl is based on the C
function rand, which is well known to be less the ideal.
Less than ideal? That's rather an understatement. Did you run
the program I attached which plots a graph of its distribution?
From the
On Mon 18 Feb, James Taylor wrote:
On Fri 15 Feb, James Taylor wrote:
The rand() function as implemented in RISC OS Perl 1.13 for
the RiscPC is *not* uniform as it should be.
Err... It's been awfully quiet since I posted that.
Been busy
Is there anybody there?
Yes
Does anybody
