Hi,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 06 September 2010, Stefan Rödiger wrote:
The dropdown menu (What next? c) would be really helpful. Indicating the
number of the plot and the fist bit of the commands
Hi,
On Monday 06 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
Can we get the last command from history?
in theory, yes, but not currently. (We do not support the R history
mechanisms, yet, but it's in the feature tracker somewhere).
Remember we are only interested in the primary plotting
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 06 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
Can we get the last command from history?
in theory, yes, but not currently. (We do not support the R history
mechanisms, yet,
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Stefan Rödiger stefan_roedi...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Dienstag 31 August 2010, 03:43:57 schrieb Prasenjit Kapat:
Hi,
Following this thread from Thomas:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rkward-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00872.htm
l
I would like to get some
HI,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 06 September 2010, Stefan Rödiger wrote:
The dropdown menu (What next? c) would be really helpful. Indicating the
number of the plot and the fist bit of the commands
Am Montag 06 September 2010, 13:10:26 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
Hi,
On Monday 06 September 2010, Stefan Rödiger wrote:
The dropdown menu (What next? c) would be really helpful. Indicating
the number of the plot and the fist bit of the commands used would be
sufficient for me.
Hi,
On Saturday 04 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
Indeed. I'll need to go back to drawing board and try to implement
things differently. Before getting into specific cases, I am
suggesting, in the interest of the upcoming release, that let us
ignore this plot history feature
On Sunday 05 September 2010, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
But perhaps it's not that hard after all? I just tried this with the
X11Cairo device:
plot(1, 1)
a - recordPlot()
dev.off()
replayPlot (a)
b - recordPlot()
identical (a, b) # TRUE
title (something's
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 04 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
Indeed. I'll need to go back to drawing board and try to implement
things differently. Before getting into specific cases, I
Am Dienstag 31 August 2010, 03:43:57 schrieb Prasenjit Kapat:
Hi,
Following this thread from Thomas:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rkward-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00872.htm
l
I would like to get some feedbacks, especially bugs.
I used the latest SVN and found no bugs (I use the
Hi,
Thanks for the quick inputs, Thomas.
To everyone: find if there is any high-level-primary plot function
which does not get recorded (technically, which does not call plot.new
()). For example: persp () does not call plot.new (), but we have
taken care of it by putting in a hook. Are there
Hi,
On Thursday 02 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de wrote:
Is it really a good idea to synchronize the plot windows that show the
same history position? I.e. if two separate windows each
Hi,
On Tuesday 31 August 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
6. The Show info action currently uses kdialog (recently changed it
from readline ()), but as soon as Thomas returns (and finds time to
implement a dialog box connection on the C++ side) I plan to change it
to a more native version.
Hi,
I was playing around with the plot history feature of Windows (windows
()) and Mac OS X's (qaurtz ()), something that I shuold've done much
earlier. They are both very minimalistic, although windows' is
slightly better. I realized that we were shooting a near ideal
solution, which is going to
Hi,
great work, overall! This is pretty sophisticated stuff, and that also means
there's a lot of details to think about and test. I'm not sure I've seen
everything, but I don't want to let you wait much longer. So here are the
notes I have taken so far in no particular order.
I'll post
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de wrote:
Hi,
great work, overall! This is pretty sophisticated stuff, and that also means
there's a lot of details to think about and test. I'm not sure I've seen
everything, but I don't want
16 matches
Mail list logo
