Am Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014, 20.38:30 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
Hi,
Morning Thomas
On Wednesday 08 October 2014 21:26:52 Mario Fux wrote:
Sorry for the delay to answer this long email and with my answer it will
become even longer but I hope it helps and otherwise just ask and CC: me
Hi Meik,
On Wednesday 08 October 2014 11:49:56 meik michalke wrote:
Am Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2014, 13:43:33 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
- For the two sample tests, when estimating the size of one of the
samples,
why not always make it the second sample (i.e. first sample size
hi,
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2014, 14:46:39 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
Well, when I wanted to make that experiment, I found that rkwarddev does
not yet handle ids on radio-options. And then I found out, that the fact
that radio-options can be disabled, dynamically, was not really
On Saturday 11 October 2014 16:56:39 meik michalke wrote:
well, in fact there is no rk.XML.option() yet ;-) all options are directly
defined by rk.XML.radio() as a list. but if one needs the possibility of
getting an ID from an option, adding rk.XML.option() seems to be inevitable.
i don't se
Hi again,
On Saturday 11 October 2014 17:44:33 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
Thus, perhaps, naming an id manually, is the way to go.
I.e rk.XML.radio() could accept options like this:
ok, I was too slow...
Well, perhaps if you can make it so that rk.XML.radio() can accept a mixed
list like
hi there,
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2014, 17:50:57 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
On Saturday 11 October 2014 17:44:33 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
Thus, perhaps, naming an id manually, is the way to go.
I.e rk.XML.radio() could accept options like this:
ok, I was too slow...
sorry ;-)
