you mean you bricked it ?
It happened with my first Ondio as well. I've been recommended to
flash it with rockbox as soon as possible.
sadly, yes. But before that I had a full running bootboxrockbox. Too silly...
My fault.
Joerch
Check the wiki; it should be possible to salvage the unit with
the uart boot mod.
Regards, Jens
Ahh, you done it! You wrote in the Wiki even if the flash content is
completely garbled Maybe there is rescue for me.
Joerch
__
Hmm, apologies for the many typos there. Hopefully it still makes a bit of
sense.
Steve Bavin
Jonathan Gordon said:
and battery life shouldnt be a reason to not release for
h300 (not that it really means anything to most of the ppl
watching this list..)
How much of an issue is battery life on the 340 anyway? I use an
up-to-date daily build all the time (usually no more than a couple of
Hi,
I agree with the people saying that we shouldn't release 3.0 or come out
of feature freeze until it's ready.
But one of the problems, is that it isn't clear (at least to me), what
are the outstanding tasks that MUST be done before we are happy to
release 3.0.
So my suggestion is that we (in
Mike Holden wrote:
For me, the battery life is a non-issue and I use my unit a lot. It could
always be improved on of course, but it's plenty good enough to release
IMHO.
If this was a question of optimization, I would agree. In this case, it
is a hardware issue, where some component is
Malcolm Tyrrell wrote:
... The moment we come out of freeze, a whole slew of new
features will go into the source, and a slew of new bugs with them.
If the current code is flaky, how much more flaky will post 3.0 code
be?
Has the possibility of maintaining seperate release branches been
Hi!
Many thanks to Sander for posting a shell script originally made by
Credits should go to iGold from the hydrogen forums.
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showuser=26599
The script is a smart and easy approach to tag mp3s with the desired
replaygain tags. However, I did some
To conclude, my question is simply which bugs do people think fall into
the must fix category? Are there any other issues not in the patch
tracker? I can't see any reports about H300 battery life and only one
about the Voice UI.
My selfish list (bugs which I believe I am suffering from)
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:47 +0100, Dave Chapman wrote:
Hi,
I agree with the people saying that we shouldn't release 3.0 or come out
of feature freeze until it's ready.
But one of the problems, is that it isn't clear (at least to me), what
are the outstanding tasks that MUST be done before
I thought I would toss in one quick opinion on the 3.0 release topic...
I've been using the H340 port heavily since late last year. The battery
life issue bugs me a bit...especially as I ponder a flight to Italy next
month. I would sure like to see it fixed, and I honestly wish I had the
time to
Hi,
just some side notes:
On 5/31/06, Sander Sweers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A better way of organizing in my opinion for your release blocker bugs
is to create a tracker bug named [TRACKER - Rockbox release 3.x] and
make all the bugs/features that should be fixed for the 3.0 release
I still think it'd be fair to make H100 the only _new_ release target for the time being. I mean the 3.0 code will be compileable for H300, and we can even make a 3.0 binary available for it, but calling it a release is like a stamp of approval, and it just doesn't seem right (in my opinion, of
wasnt the general consensus to keep the freeze going for a bit longer
and really try to get ppl focused on the problems?
and like has been said a million times already.. the battery issue
shouldnt keep the h300 out of the release.. just put it as a known
issue that is being looked into in the
Most completely casual users won't even complain though. They'll try it, dislike it, and then switch back.I still very strongly feel that a known bug of that degree should not simply be a noted issue in the comments. What *strong* reson is there to include H300 in this release? The code will be
15 matches
Mail list logo