On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 17:26 -0400, Steve Moskovchenko wrote:
The only 'IDE' you need is Kate. Its got a nifty terminal at the bottom
of the screen, so occasionally i click into that and type 'make'.
Session management, open file tracking, block selection, and all that
good stuff included.
ive been fine with kate and grep in a seperate console.. but ive just
installed kdevelop and im gonna have a play
On 11/06/06, bk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 17:26 -0400, Steve Moskovchenko wrote:
The only 'IDE' you need is Kate. Its got a nifty terminal at the bottom
of
Hello,
I'm using cvs under windows which converts every file to CR-LF style
when I check out. For some reason, apps/plugins/mp3_encoder.c has
CR-LF line endings in the repository which gives me two CR on every
line for this file. This is too much for the compiler.
Maybe a developer with
Simon M. wrote:
Maybe a developer with write-access to cvs could upload a version of
mp3_encoder.c with unix line endings please.
Done.
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
It indicates your CVS client is weird.
I know. It is the native Win32 version which coverts the LFs to CR LF
automatically (and there is no way to stop this).
This is a real problem with my VMWare-Dev-Platform but I solve it by
converting configure and buildzip.pl
I know. It is the native Win32 version which coverts the LFs to CR LF
automatically (and there is no way to stop this).
Grab TortoiseCVS, much better and full Explorer shell integration:
http://www.tortoisecvs.org/
--
gl
hm, I suppose this doesn't work on the commandline and with emacs...
I give it a try.
Ah, don't know...
--
gl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:30:17 +0200
schrieb Simon M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/11/06, gl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grab TortoiseCVS, much better and full Explorer shell integration:
http://www.tortoisecvs.org/
--
gl
hm, I suppose this doesn't
Stephan Wezel wrote:
or we could switch to svn(subversion). Because svn has an option with
that the eol-style ist set depending on the OS on wich the checkout is
done.
I heartily second this. Having used both cvs and subversion,
subversion is much better in its features and more
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heartily second this. Having used both cvs and subversion, subversion is
much better in its features and more user-friendly.
There's no denying of this.
We've been discussing and intending to switch away from CVS for a long time,
and we all
10 matches
Mail list logo
