Re: Release policy and coordination

Paul Louden wrote: Most completely casual users won't even complain though. They'll try it, dislike it, and then switch back. I still very strongly feel that a known bug of that degree should not simply be a noted issue in the comments. What *strong* reson is there to include H300 in this

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have frozen!

I'm pleased to announce that we've reached a milestone on the road to a release of Rockbox 3.0. As of this morning, CVS is now officially in feature freeze. This means that until the release of Rockbox 3.0, the only patches accepted into CVS will be those which fix an existing bug in the

Roxkbox Release Schedule (exciting news from Devcon!)

Rockbox 3.0 - codename Mayday Feature freeze: 0:00 CET, Mon 3rd April 2006 * No new features will be accepted into CVS for a period of four weeks from this date. * Commits limited to bugfixes related to the functionality detailed below. Proposed Release date: 1st May 2006 Supported

Re: What has happened with our beloved RomBox? (binary size on Archos targets)

[IDC]Dragon wrote: It works! uuuh! only 1,666 MB buffer, i think its better for daily use to go back to an older build with 1,8 MB buffer... What happened to our buffer, who sliced that chunk away? I'm not really following latest developments, was it unicode, was it graphical wps, or what?

Re: Hi Wavpack broken?

David Bryant wrote: I agree that handling the correction files would be great. Unfortunately, in this case the problem is resources. Handling the correction files takes about an additional 40% CPU cycles on the PC, and that doesn't take into account the extra disk reading. In WavPack's high

Re: My vote for BMP cache removal

Thom Johansen wrote: I think it should be taken out as soon as possible. It's flawed in the sense that it can't possibly detect whether the cache is invalid without destroying the entire purpose of the cache in the first place. We've already had a user coming in asking questions about why his

Re: About Rockbox utility, for Christi

Alessio Lenzi wrote: I am a Rockbox blind user , i found your post dealing with your utility to simplify Rockbox installation and upgrade reading this list. I immediately installed the program, i think it's really useful. Since last december have you released any other version? Im afraid the

Re: Announcing the Rockbox Utility

Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote: Christi Alice Scarborough wrote: - Only download the installer once. It then grabs Rockbox from the website. Can it install offline? I want to be able to download the build and install later. Shouldn't be too difficult to add this. At the moment it's

Announcing the Rockbox Utility

I've been beavering away for the past few weeks, and I'm happy to say that I'm finally in a state where I'm ready to show the fruits of my efforts to others. The Rockbox Utility is a new installer for Rockbox. Don't we already have one of those, I hear you cry? Yes, but Rockbox Utility is much

Submitting WPS files to Rockbox

If you'd like to submit your custom WPS for inclusion in Rockbox, please consult the guidelines available at http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/SubmitWPS Following these guidelines will help us to quickly incorporate your work into the Rockbox project. Thanks.