Jens Arnold wrote:
I would be happy to see any of my contributed code relicensed
under GPLv3, exactly *because* of the clauses in it which should
prevent both TiVoization and usage for DRM purposes.
Tivo-isation has been used as a phrase here a few times, but I am unclear
as to what exactly
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, q wrote:
Recently the IRC channel has been rather full of discussion around the
current licensing of Rockbox (GPLV2 is how most people interpret it, but
it
*is* a little unclear)
Without really taking a stand, I want to clarify what I think of the or
later situation.
We have sound on the Sansa E200 series.
We've been getting closer and closer since Rene Peinthor and Christian
Gmeiner visited AustriaMicrosytems on Friday.
For what it's worth, the first track played was Your Face My Ass by
Lambchop. If Amiconn can break with tradition, then I will too!
Dan
I'm working on a win based sansa emulator.
...
If anybody is interested, I can send the source code.
I'm interested!
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:44, Barry Wardell wrote:
Hi,
I've been working with Daniel Ankers on getting a dual bootloader
working on the Sansa (and also on the H10). In doing so, it was
necessary to make some changes to crt0-pp.S (patch attached)
...
I've tested on my own H10 and Sansa
My point is, that when you have the simple view, and turn on advanced, a
bunch of settings just appeared, and you have no idea which, or where
they are. This makes it, in my eyes, more confusing than simply always
having all options available.
Another option is having options grayed out if
: With regards to creating a thread on the second core, there is no
: guarantee that this will be available even on PortalPlayer machines, so
: the code to create a thread on the second core would be something like:
:
: my_thread = create_thread_on_core(COPROCESSOR, my_function, my_stack,
:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Initial work for coprocessor support on iPods. FS#5755
...
+/* This is the entry point for the coprocessor
+ Anyone not running an upgraded bootloader will never reach this
point,
+ so it should not be assumed that the coprocessor be
