On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Frank Gevaerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there's a reasonable chance that attempted 3-month cycles will
turn out to take 4 months anyway (and 4-month atempts would take 5
months), so I think staying with 3 months is a good idea
Plus, if we find that
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Dave Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Releases happen every 3 months, with the date of 3.0 (23rd September)
being the reference point, so releases would be:
I quite like this idea. With Rockbox it is quite difficult to quantize what
makes a release, so time
The *INF.PVR files describe the *DAT.PVR files from what I can see.
I've just given them a quick look over - and all I've gleaned so far
is that the the second dword in the file is the size of the DAT file
in bytes.
Additionally the 63rd dword is either equal to the 2nd (the file size)
or the 4th,
On 8/3/07, Jacob Rau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot see any place online where firmware files are available--this might
mean bad news for me. I suppose there is probably a way to re-write the
chip, even if it isn't inside the player.
As far as I could see, there aren't any firmware updates
Hi Daniel.
Unfortunately making rockbox speak that particular piece of information is
not possible simply by editing english.lang.
However, if you tell me what type of MP3 player you are using, I could
possibly make a customized build of Rockbox that would read out the time
remaining.
Will.
On
Hey there Alex, glad to hear you're interested.
A good place to start would be to grab a copy of the rockbox CVS source and
modify it to add the functions you like.
Once you've done that you could make a patch and submit it to the rockbox
patch tracker
I've been advocating these patches on IRC, but I haven't actually gotten around to looking at them myself.I've made a point to actually compile a build with the splash screen enhancements, and I'll post back my thoughts once I've done this.
Keep up the great work :)On 11/1/06, Paul Louden [EMAIL
I'm indifferent about the info screen talkativeness, but I really like the splash screen work, and a talking quick screen would be excellent.I really hope someone can find the time to look at these patches and commit them, I believe they would enhance the voice experience a significant amount.
I also vote #4On 9/26/06, Bluechip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, I would vote for the little-tick option-setHowever I would propose option 5RIGHT = move tick; ON = move+exit; LEFT = exit; OFF = cancel+exitbut unless people think ^that^ idea is kewl, I suppose it's a vote
for
Oh well, I preferred the name Rockblox anyway :)It is a worry though, these increasing claims - how long will it be before one of the many users of the word Rockbox (or similar) come after us - or do we have some kind of immunity on that one?
On 8/23/06, Jonas H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, in that case, people will be unable to change certain optionswithout having to use a computer. Maybe some sort of .cfg-file editorplugin could be created, which would then expose all available options
(or maybe just the hidden ones).What,
Test recieved.On 8/8/06, mat holton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
test
I'm in full support of this decision. When feature freeze wasn't in effect there were a lot of really interesting and cool new things being added, and honestly, the most interesting thing that's happened in the CVS logs in the past week has been some kind of solitaire bugfix (I play solitaire a
Hi Paul.I think the forums probably could do with a clean up, and most of the stuff you have suggested rings true, but I think the fact that you've designated sections to bug reporting and feature requests are not needed.
I feel that it makes the bugs/feature requests far harder to track, as you'd
Hrm, you make many valid points Paul, especially on the fact that Flyspray doesn't really attract the same level of input as the forum does. I guess as long as the issues that are reported on the forums were transferred to flyspray once they were confirmed and discussed, it would keep everything
I think we can say that you hold the current record for fastest rockboxing at the moment.Now, who wants to break it!And congratulations!Will.On 3/31/06,
Manuel Dejonghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/30/06, Jens Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today I finally received my newest rockboxable device
Bluechip, as far as I see, you're wasting your time here.You clearly stand nothing to gain, as you have made it completely clear that you aren't going to reveal your real name, and the rockbox team have made it just as clear that this is a requirement for the acceptance of your code.
The only
17 matches
Mail list logo
