Re: Bumping arm, sh, and m68k toolchains to gcc 4.9.4

2020-07-05 Thread Solomon Peachy via rockbox-dev
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:11:05AM +0200, Sebastian Leonhardt via rockbox-dev wrote: > I have some PP-based players to test. Unfortunately I'll be absent for > several days now, so it has to wait. It seems to be okay on the mini2g, but I've not exactly pushed it hard. > Can I run the old and

Re: Bumping arm, sh, and m68k toolchains to gcc 4.9.4

2020-07-05 Thread Sebastian Leonhardt via rockbox-dev
Another update, this time with good news! Nice! Good work! So. I'm not comfortable committing this toolchain bump without wider testing of gcc494 builds on sh, m68k and various other native arm targets (especially other portalplayer-based units!) Any volunteers? I have some PP-based

Re: Bumping arm, sh, and m68k toolchains to gcc 4.9.4

2020-07-05 Thread Solomon Peachy via rockbox-dev
Another update, this time with good news! I'm writing this listening to music with a demo plugin running simultaneously on a mini2g (PP502x) built using gcc 4.9.4 (see g#2305) There turned out to be two major (and independent) problems: * arm corelock asm code was relying on constructs that,