Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-10-07 Thread Liberman Shachar
That's actually very interesting imo. I was going through the Gnu gpl but I can't figure out if it has anything to do with registered trademarks. - Original Message - From: Björn Stenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: gmane.comp.systems.archos.rockbox.devel Sent: Tuesday, September

Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-20 Thread Mike Holden
Michael Sevakis said: I wasn't speaking of the World Wrestling Federation :) but re: Rockbox. As I understand the same names can be used if not to indicate the same thing, at least in the US. Dumb example: Foo Meat Packing, Inc. and Foo Manufacturing, Inc. aren't nescessarily in conflict.

Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-20 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Mike Holden wrote: Apple and Apple are prime examples of how this works in the real world. Apple records sold records, and Apple corp made computers and software. However in the modern global multimedia market, both are treading on each other's toes quite a lot in terms

Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-19 Thread Will Robertson
Oh well, I preferred the name Rockblox anyway :)It is a worry though, these increasing claims - how long will it be before one of the many users of the word Rockbox (or similar) come after us - or do we have some kind of immunity on that one?

RE: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-19 Thread Christopher Woods
Tetrox too, it's way catchier. :D From: Will Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 September 2006 00:38To: Rockbox developmentSubject: Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons Oh well, I preferred the name Rockblox anyway :)It is a worry though, these increasing claims - how

Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-19 Thread Jonathan Gordon
' was first used)... ... I like Rockblox better than Tetrox too, it's way catchier. :D From: Will Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 September 2006 00:38 To: Rockbox development Subject: Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons Oh well, I

Re: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-19 Thread Michael Sevakis
About a couple weeks ago after Rockbox appeared in one the online mags (pc-mag?) I suspected that this would start happening if rb mattered too much. Now it's for real! Has this sort of thing occurred before? - Original Message - From: Björn Stenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-19 Thread Jim Tinney
Michael Sevakis said: About a couple weeks ago after Rockbox appeared in one the online mags (pc-mag?) I suspected that this would start happening if rb mattered too much. Now it's for real! Has this sort of thing occurred before? See WWF (renaming of, copyright infringement)... Looks like the

RE: Tetrox renamed to Rockblox, for trademark reasons

2006-09-19 Thread Jim Tinney
Michael Sevakis said: I wasn't speaking of the World Wrestling Federation :) but re: Rockbox. As I understand the same names can be used if not to indicate the same thing, at least in the US. Dumb example: Foo Meat Packing, Inc. and Foo Manufacturing, Inc. aren't nescessarily in conflict.