Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Qt API docs

2013-09-03 Thread Tom Breton (Tehom)
> On 09/03/2013 08:30 AM, Ted Felix wrote: > >> But they did move this. What was your usual path through this? > > I was using the 4.7 docs, since we always get in trouble for using the > newer APIs. Looking at the 4.8 and 5.0 docs, what I was whining about > is mostly irrelevant. The structure

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Qt API docs

2013-09-03 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On 09/03/2013 08:30 AM, Ted Felix wrote: > But they did move this. What was your usual path through this? I was using the 4.7 docs, since we always get in trouble for using the newer APIs. Looking at the 4.8 and 5.0 docs, what I was whining about is mostly irrelevant. The structure is all di

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Qt API docs

2013-09-03 Thread Ted Felix
On 09/03/2013 07:36 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > If you haven't had the pleasure yet, get ready. The new online API docs > really suck. > > Being accomplished at navigating the old setup, I find this new setup a > horrible step backwards. It's a lot harder to find what I want, and > requires

[Rosegarden-devel] Qt API docs

2013-09-03 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
If you haven't had the pleasure yet, get ready. The new online API docs really suck. Being accomplished at navigating the old setup, I find this new setup a horrible step backwards. It's a lot harder to find what I want, and requires much more work. -- D. Michael McIntyre --