Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread ram
Yeah, I do something similar. I record the raw audio tracks with Rosegarden and then when I have all the tracks (and then some), I pull them into Audacity for editing, mixing, and processing. Outputs are usually stereo, 5.1, and 7.1 flac files to be merged with video. I use a Linux cluster and

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread Will Godfrey
Just adding my take on the audio front. I frequently collaborate with people who send me audio guitar and/or vocal tracks. I load these into Rosegarden, then produce MIDI tracks to make my additions. On very rare occasion I'll do some processing of the audio with plugins in Rosegarden, but I

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread Demonic Sweaters
Chiming in as well, There's a few points I've read in this list that I wanted to respond to. 1. nobody uses rosegarden for audio - I actually have, and do, several songs have even been released on some albums of mine recorded this way. Sure, it's not the most fully featured for audio, but

Re: [Rosegarden-user] LV2... Why?

2020-03-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On 3/11/20 11:43 PM, Ted Felix wrote:   Just wondering why folks want LV2 support.  Not that I'll ever get to it, but some justification will help focus the effort.  Thanks. I've been ignoring the issue for quite a few years, but I spent some time today looking at what lv2 is, what plugins