Re: our section of the paper wrt. ProcessSpecification/Role/ServiceBinding/Service

2002-05-06 Thread Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
- Original Message - From: William J. Kammerer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WEDi/SNIP ID Routing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: Re: our section of the paper wrt. ProcessSpecification/Role/ServiceBinding/Service Dick: Unfortunately, in a message centric

Re: FW: Article

2002-05-06 Thread Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
- Original Message - From: Fody, Kenneth W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today, we do accept claims for non-covered services and, assuming the information we need to determine whether the benefit is covered or not is present, we process those claims, and deny them. But, that means they are

Re: our section of the paper wrt.ProcessSpecification/Role/ServiceBinding/Service

2002-05-06 Thread Robert Barclay
Just a warning about 837s. Even if the 837 claim passes the TA1/997/824 gauntlet it could still be rejected by a 277 Front End Acknowledgment before reaching an 835. The billing should expect a response to all 837 claims submitted but the 835 is not the only transactions that can do this,

RE: FW: Article

2002-05-06 Thread Mimi Hart
My personal two cents worth...I am also disappointed in some of the comments that have been made since David forwarded the article... I don't believe that AHA is advocating the payment of fraudulant claims, or even non-claims ...I believe they were giving voice to the frustrations of providers

Re: our section of the paper wrt.ProcessSpecification/Role/ServiceBinding/Service

2002-05-06 Thread Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
- Original Message - From: Robert Barclay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just a warning about 837s. Even if the 837 claim passes the TA1/997/824 gauntlet it could still be rejected by a 277 Front End Acknowledgment before reaching an 835. The billing should expect a response to all 837 claims