On Friday 22 of June 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Hmm, apologies for empty message. I swear I wrote something.
What I said is that there is a possibility that 2 -lz linkages might
be needed for -lneon external and zlib internal.
Huh, that would only mean that your libneon.so is broken (not
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
[...]
The '-' character is already in use, %{?-F} expands to -F if defined.
Then use perhaps =. I do not mind very much about the actual character.
But at least need the literal part as the macro name and the literal
part are certainly different...
Hello,
what is the best way to store (more or less) arbitrary metadata in RPM headers?
The thing is, at ALT Linux we build RPMs from git repositories, and
I'd like to store the commit ID, repository URL etc. somewhere in the
binary RPM (to match binary RPMs to their sources). Later on I may
On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Alex Myltsev wrote:
Hello,
what is the best way to store (more or less) arbitrary metadata in
RPM headers?
The issue for rpm is arbitrary because any metadata in headers (if
successful)
will eventually need a well defined usage semantic.
The thing is,
Time to get with the RPM_CHECK_LIB program.
I managed to fumble my way to a successful build last
night. Now I'm trying to get a fire-and-forget setup
together.
Here's the linux build I usually do:
db internal
zlibinternal
fileinternal
lua internal
neon
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Time to get with the RPM_CHECK_LIB program.
Fine ;-)
I managed to fumble my way to a successful build last
night. Now I'm trying to get a fire-and-forget setup
together.
Here's the linux build I usually do:
dbinternal
zlib
On Jun 22, 2007, at 11:50 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Log:
allow people like Jeff to build with more internal stuff
(although I
personally think we shouldn't do this ;-)
We agree.
I still gotta get 4.5/5.0 srpm snapshots together this evening.
Shall I feature regress?
73
On Jun 22, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
All fine except that I think file (as it is not modified, isn't it?)
you can easily keep externally.
Yes, file is unmodified.
The ratinale for internal file is solely to control for magic
On Jun 22, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
OK. I'll likely have more info shortly.
Here's config.status snippet:
s,@CFLAGS@,|#_!!_#|-g -O2 -fPIC -DPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -
Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-
char-subscripts -fpie
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jun 22, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Ah, yes, grep is my friend. Digging ...
Here's set -x spew:
[..]
+ test . '!=' .
=== isn't the IFS=: missing here?
+ for __rcl_location in '${with_beecrypt}'
10 matches
Mail list logo
