Nothing wrong with the patch.
But a more general "policy" mechanism, with
PCRE/GLOB patterns to enable/disable dependency
extraction on a per-interpreter basis is needed.
The filtering from PLD is a pretty sound step in that direction.
But note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
> I'll knock out the "r.fpio" for you if asked.
> I certainly wouldn't mind. :)
>
I'll assume that is "asked" ... todo++.
This path needs to become a macro:
#define _FILES_AWAITING_FILETRIGGERS "/var/lib/rpm/files-awaiting-filetriggers
2009/11/18 Jeff Johnson
>
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
> > Index: rpm/lib/filetriggers.c
> >
>
> > $ cvs diff -u -r2.19 -r2.20 filetriggers.c
> > --- rpm/lib/filetriggers.c 2 Sep 2009
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> But its all under
> #ifdef RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA
> so "Have it your own way!"
There's a memory leak here if %{_filetriggers_dir} is not defined:
static const char * filetriggers_dir(void)
/*...@globals _filetriggers_dir, rpmGlo
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
>> Index: rpm/lib/filetriggers.c
>>
>> $ cvs diff -u -r2.19 -r2.20 filetriggers.c
>> --- rpm/lib/filetrigg
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> Index: rpm/lib/filetriggers.c
>
> $ cvs diff -u -r2.19 -r2.20 filetriggers.c
> --- rpm/lib/filetriggers.c 2 Sep 2009 10:29:13 - 2.19
> +++ rpm/li
On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
> Hmm, if not automatically handling this in code, what about some option,
> macro or something? It obviously seems like something that a lot of people is
> likely to run into and therefore should be dealt with in a way easily usable
>
2009/11/18 Jeff Johnson
>
> So what is needed is a --rebuilddb with the PROT_WRITE added, and
> then revert to only setting PROT_READ. How you wish to achieve
> that conversion on the fly is up to you. The forward looking goal
> is to use PROT_READ hardware protection rather than all the
> overly
