Hi,
the chroot environment that was producing bogus dependency messages when
checking BuildRequires last week has moved on to not installing binary
packages anymore, saying
/var/lib/rpm/Packages: DB_SECONDARY_BAD: Secondary index inconsistent with
primary
error: db4 error(-30973) from
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:53:04 -0500, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
So only BuildRequires: ? I'll look, so far I haven't
paid much attention to BuildRequires and so I may have missed something.
Yes, so far it only happened when trying
Hi,
Here's two more ways:
1) dumping the index
cd /var/lib/rpm
db_dump -p Providename
[r...@matterhorn rpm]# /usr/lib/rpm/bin/db_dump -p Providename |grep -A1
-B1 gdbm
\00\00\03O
gdbm
\00\00\03\d9
gdbm-debug\ac
\00\00\03T
gdbm-devel\ac
\00\00\04v
gdbm-static\95
This just started to happen inside a chroot environment with HEAD from
last week:
[r...@matterhorn ~]# rpm -ivh /openldap-2.4.19-1ark.src.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
gdbm-devel is needed by openldap-2.4.19-1ark.src
openssl-devel is needed by openldap-2.4.19-1ark.src
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:42:37 -0500, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
trying to install a new system into a chroot jail currently fails:
# rpm -r /mnt/dest -ivh /RPMS/*.rpm
rpm: rpmdb.c:254:dbiOpen: Assertion `__dbapi == 3 || __dbapi
Possibly caused by a slightly corrupted rpmdb, it has gone through its
share of updates to HEAD snapshots...
Starting program: /bin/rpm -e kdepim
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Freeing read locks for locker 0x21: 1542/140325654452096
Freeing read locks for locker 0x23:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:26:23 +0100, Bernhard Rosenkränzer
b...@arklinux.org wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:42:37 -0500, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
trying to install a new system into a chroot jail currently fails:
# rpm -r /mnt
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:23:30 -0500, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
I can likely guess what needs to be done, but it would help if you
could send along the -vv spewage so I can confirm my guess.
D: pool fd: created size 212 limit -1 flags 0
D: pool lua:created size 32 limit -1 flags 0
Hi,
trying to install a new system into a chroot jail currently fails:
# rpm -r /mnt/dest -ivh /RPMS/*.rpm
rpm: rpmdb.c:254:dbiOpen: Assertion `__dbapi == 3 || __dbapi == 4' failed.
(The same thing works if I run the command from a proper system rather
than a stripped down system that doesn't
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 21.18:48 Mark Hatle wrote:
We handle this by doing installs in the following order:
*) passwd/group (rpm2cpio)
*) filesystem/basesystem/setup
*) Everything else
Our approach is rather similar --
1. Install filesystem/basesystem
2. Install setup
3. rpm -Uvh --force
Hi,
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 20.56:42 Jeff Johnson wrote:
There's this build failure with embedded javascript
that's not yet handled in rpm/js/src/Makefile.am:
try
BUILT_SOURCES = jsautocfg.h jsautokw.h
ttyl
bero
Hi,
the attached patch makes current git apt-rpm build with
rpm5 again, and shouldn't have any bad side effects.
It doesn't work 100% though: It fails to resolve file
dependencies (e.g. it complains about xauth: Depends:
/bin/sh but it is not installable when rpm --whatprovides
/bin/sh knows
Hi,
we're finally at a point where we have all packages built with
rpm5 - and just tried to do a test install. Basically it works,
but we've spotted a few problems that appear to be rpm5
bugs.
Our installer does
mount /dev/something /mnt/dest
# Before that, /dev/something has been freshly
Hi,
I finally got around to fixing various problems with apt-rpm when used with
rpm5 -- the last being apt-get update hanging because of a bug in
rpm4compat.h.
Now it gets the lists and starts resolving dependencies, but it complains
about the rpm internal dependencies for loads of installed
On Friday 18 July 2008 17.12:31 Jeff Johnson wrote:
- rpm4compat: fix: rpmdsSingle() is a C, not a C++, routine.
That was right before - the purpose of rpmdsSingle() in rpm4compat.h
(intentionally in #ifdef __cplusplus) is a workaround for a difference
between C and C++:
In rpm4, rpmdsSingle
In older rpm versions, this spec fragment would cause %_bindir/someapp to be
included:
%install
make install
# consolehelper comes from a different package, therefore the symlink
# being created here is dangling
ln -s consolehelper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_bindir/someapp
%files
%_bindir/*
In 5.1.4
Trying to rebuild
http://arklinux.org/~bero/kdelibs-4.1.0-0.822040.1ark.src.rpm
with rpm 5.1.3 results in
error: line 106: Package does not exist: %description -n kimgio-exr
However, line 100 of the spec file does define that package unconditionally.
The same package worked with older rpm
On Thursday 19 June 2008 14:16:54 Jeff Johnson wrote:
Hmmm, here's a different issue with the package. LZMA payload
identification and/or decompression will need to be looked at as well:
Weird, it installs just fine here.
Maybe it's an incompatibility between different lzma-utils versions, the
On Saturday 14 June 2008 16.44:57 Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
In the particular case of apt, there's another thing I just noticed -- both
rpm and apt come with an internalized version of lua.
Chances are the simple symbol clash caused by this is what causes the
crash. Guess switching both
On Saturday 14 June 2008 15.55:21 Jeff Johnson wrote:
There's a class of peculier issues with initializing under bindings
and applications because the code paths are rather different. I get
burned by the library - executable initialization differences
frequently.
In the particular case of
20 matches
Mail list logo
