Since today, Mandriva is using rpm.org.
So to continue to fully test and work on rpm5.org, I am looking for a
distribution which do plan to use rpm5.
This surelly mean I'll contribute to it if I find some rpm missing to me.
(Notice I am a mandriva contributer already, I maintain lot of perl
Le mardi 20 novembre 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:38 AM, David Halik wrote:
I've had some issues in rpmxs.c with Sun Studio in Solaris 9 and
5.0a2. The first prob was missing symbols in the build process:
rpmxs.c, line 192: undefined symbol: rpmBuildFlags
rpmxs.c,
Le lundi 01 octobre 2007, Anders F Björklund a écrit :
Jeff Johnson wrote:
RPM_Transaction.xs:308: error: too many arguments to function
'rpmdbAdd'
RPM_Transaction.xs: In function 'XS_RPM__Transaction_dbremove':
An argument was removed in 3 functions. I can back an unused argument
if
Le vendredi 07 septembre 2007, Robert Scheck a écrit :
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Robert Scheck wrote:
IMHO the second result is simply wrong. RPM.so is not linked to librpm*
somehow. Why? What went wrong? Ideas?
FYI: During make in koji, the following showed up, too. Maybe this could be
Le dimanche 2 septembre 2007, Olivier Thauvin a écrit :
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
___
_
Server: rpm5.org Name: Olivier Thauvin
Root: /v/rpm/cvs
Le samedi 25 août 2007, Anders F Björklund a écrit :
* it ignores any unrecognized LDFLAGS: (MakeMaker problem ?)
Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-arch'
Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: 'ppc'
Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-arch'
Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored:
Le mardi 21 août 2007, Anders F Björklund a écrit :
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
___
_
Server: rpm5.org Name: Olivier Thauvin
Root: /v/rpm/cvs
After a short discussion on irc with Jeff, I decide to work on the part I know
the best: build/.
My goal is to provide a way to cleanly build a packages (so many packages) for
many architectures (--target foo --target bar) in envirronement and w/o the
current recursivity.
My though is to
Le jeudi 09 août 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
Truly, why bother with indices if you're iterating? is mostly my
current answer.
The rpmdsSetIX function is in rpmds.h, and making a binding is quitte easy, so
anyone who to use it can.
I replace it be a perl function using rpmdsInit and
Le lundi 6 août 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le lundi 6 août 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall a écrit :
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
- perl/typemap \
+ perl/MANIFEST perl/META.yml perl/Makefile.PL.in perl
I ask here just in case someone have an idea.
On mandriva, we're using rpm 4.4.8. Just after a fresh install (cooker), when
trying to install a package, we get, sometimes, this message:
rpmdb: Requirename: bad page number #
The same for several index.
Of course install is done with --root.
On
I just have a look to the perl module code we provide with rpm5, and I'd like
to massivelly rework it:
- namespace seems inconsitent
- some useless #ifdef RPM41 (we don't have to deal with different version of
RPM)
- some non working old code.
- only one source file (splitting would help
Le vendredi 27 juillet 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jul 27, 2007, at 3:16 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Does anyone mind if I rework it completly ?
Go for it! I guess everyone is happy if you investigate on the perl/
subdir and make it working out-of-the-box under --with-perl. I even
,
Solaris != solaris, Windows != windows, Hurd != hurd, etc...).
On Jul 25, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Some old rpm which don't install with rpm 4.4.8, the reason is this
one:
$ rpm -qp --qf %{OS} != linux\n /tmp/VMware-
server-1.0.3-44356.i386.rpm
Linux != linux
Yes
Some old rpm which don't install with rpm 4.4.8, the reason is this one:
$ rpm -qp --qf %{OS} != linux\n /tmp/VMware-server-1.0.3-44356.i386.rpm
Linux != linux
Yes, that sucks.
For mandriva I did this patch, but I hesistate to commit it into cvs, WDYT ?
(It lowercase OS tag before pushing it
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jul 22, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jul 22, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
1. Why are Conflictname, Depends and Triggername missing?
Depends is a temporary
I am in way to commit into cvs (HEAD) rpmconstant [1].
This small library was designed for RPM4 [2] to make easier the parsing from
STRING to C value in binding.
I am trying to make integration less intrusive as possible. The only part of
code I will change is configure.ac to add subdir
Le samedi 21 juillet 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall a écrit :
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I am in way to commit into cvs (HEAD) rpmconstant [1].
This small library was designed for RPM4 [2] to make easier the parsing
from STRING to C value in binding.
I am trying to make
Le mardi 17 juillet 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall a écrit :
1. except for very small and harmless hacks, the RPM 5 build environment
is now really acceptably clean and mostly untwisted
again. Especially, mostly all hard-coded (and often even
distribution-specific) installation paths and
Le mardi 17 juillet 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
ix86-freebsd6.2
amd64-freebsd6.2
ix86-freebsd7.0
ix86-fedora7
ix86-debian3.1
ix86-debian4.0
ix86-rhel4
ix86-solaris9
sparc64-solaris8
sparc64-solaris9
sparc64-solaris10
Le mardi 17 juillet 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jul 17, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
I'm currently investigating on the mktemp/mkstemp(3) front
and stumbled over IMHO totally broken uses in e.g. build.c:
| tmpSpecFile = (char *) rpmGetPath(%{_specdir}/, rpm-
Le lundi 16 juillet 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jul 15, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I am currently trying to cleanup perl-RPM4, and to have some powerfull
function, I need to deal with internal Source, Package_s and Spec
internal
structure.
Does anyone is against
Le lundi 16 juillet 2007, Robert Scheck a écrit :
It's me again,
does somebody know the current state of the support for rpmrc in rpm 4.5?
Jeff ripped it partially out, but for full compatibility with rpm.org we
should at least bring this back for now. When looking to rpm --showrc from
I am currently trying to cleanup perl-RPM4, and to have some powerfull
function, I need to deal with internal Source, Package_s and Spec internal
structure.
Does anyone is against the (not completed yet, need doc, etc...) attached
patch ?
Do you think adding:
#ifdef _SPEC_INTERNAL
#endif
to
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Here a classic scenario observed with rpm 4.4.8:
vi /etc/foo.config
rpm -Uvh foo...rpm
= /etc/foo.config which is %config(noreplace) in foo...rpm were
replace.
This does
Here a classic scenario observed with rpm 4.4.8:
vi /etc/foo.config
rpm -Uvh foo...rpm
= /etc/foo.config which is %config(noreplace) in foo...rpm were replace.
This does not happend when /etc/foo.config was own by a package.
This is a regression according previous rpm behavior, and is annoying
Le mardi 3 juillet 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jul 3, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le mardi 3 juillet 2007, Olivier Thauvin a écrit :
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Log:
rpmlib.h expose some mire related function
Le jeudi 21 juin 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Objections?
No objection. Both %setup and %patch (what I call implemented-in-C
macros)
have been known deficient since 1998. I don't believe any reasonable
change will
help or harm.
Le mercredi 20 juin 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
So, let me summarize for our record here on rpm-devel:
Randy Ray: rpm5.org: rpm/perl/ (Perl-RPM 0.66, ancient)
Chip Turner: rpm5.org: perl-RPM2/ (Perl-RPM2 0.68
Le jeudi 21 juin 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday 20 of June 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Right now from config.log:
configure:27985: error: unable to find available BeeCrypt library
but why it told so, you
Le vendredi 08 juin 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
The topic can surprise you, but here the reason of this question.
Rpm has internal dependencies (you can see it in rpm --showrc), and
some of
this dependencies are set into rpm archive
Le samedi 02 juin 2007, Jeff Johnson a écrit :
One of the largest sources of incompatibilities using rpmbuild is
that each vendor has their own special dialect that is used for
packaging.
So one vendor's packaging won't build with another vendor's
build system. Not good.
There is also an
32 matches
Mail list logo
