Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/scripts/ dbconvert.sh

2010-11-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > >>> >> Didn't get the hint.. :/ >> > > OK. > > See this link > > http://pm:8010/builders/MDV1x_rpm_release/builds/11/steps/compile_5/logs/stdio > Sorry "pm" == "plymouth" a

Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/scripts/ dbconvert.sh

2010-11-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: >> > Didn't get the hint.. :/ > OK. See this link http://pm:8010/builders/MDV1x_rpm_release/builds/11/steps/compile_5/logs/stdio You are looking at Mandriva 2010.1, and "make check" is being run. Down toward'd the bottom, you w

Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/scripts/ dbconvert.sh

2010-11-11 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
2010/11/11 Jeff Johnson : > > On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > >> Could you verify and make any appropriate modifications to it, and >> also integrate the one referred to (if necessar/possible/relevant?) in >> the mail with Shlomi? >> >> Then I'll upload a new version to coo

Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/scripts/ dbconvert.sh

2010-11-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > Could you verify and make any appropriate modifications to it, and > also integrate the one referred to (if necessar/possible/relevant?) in > the mail with Shlomi? > > Then I'll upload a new version to cooker. :) Hint: Watch the buildbot'

Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/scripts/ dbconvert.sh

2010-11-11 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
Could you verify and make any appropriate modifications to it, and also integrate the one referred to (if necessar/possible/relevant?) in the mail with Shlomi? Then I'll upload a new version to cooker. :) 2010/11/11 Per Ųyvind Karlsen : >  RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository >  http://rpm5.org/cvs

Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/scripts/ dbconvert.sh

2010-11-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
Nice! I knew if I remained being a "lazy schmuck" long enough a check-in would appear ;-\ What remains is to figger what invokes the script ... %posttrans is feasible (but if you miss you're toast). And URPMI can (of course) do whatever it chooses to do. The problem there is that its not just UR