On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
But this isn't the time/pace to discuss relative merits
of user/group management … the rpmdsCompare needs to
be extended to include the namespace in the comparison.
Would something like this do the job (works-for-me)?
Or is it too simplified?
---
On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
But this isn't the time/pace to discuss relative merits
of user/group management … the rpmdsCompare needs to
be extended to include the namespace in the comparison.
Would something like this
On Sep 12, 2012, at 2:56 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:06:45PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
There's no well defined semantic for
Provides: group(mpd)
even if PLD has adopted some convention afaik. The
Provides: group(mpd)
is just a
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
$ LC_ALL=C sudo rpm -Uhv systemd-187-4.x86_64.rpm
systemd-libs-187-4.x86_64.rpm systemd-units-187-4.x86_64.rpm
On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-5.4.10-0.12.x86_64
The problem comes from mpd and stunnel have Provides user(%{name}) and
group(%{name}), and rpm mixes RPMNS_TYPE_USER/RPMNS_TYPE_GROUP namespace
deps with RPMNS_TYPE_VERSION(?)
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-5.4.10-0.12.x86_64
The problem comes from mpd and stunnel have Provides user(%{name}) and
group(%{name}), and rpm mixes
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-5.4.10-0.12.x86_64
On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
No, it's this piece of code in rpmlib lib/depends.c:~1450:
Got it …
mi = rpmtsInitIterator(ts, RPMTAG_PROVIDENAME, Name, 0);
(void) rpmmiPrune(mi,
ts-removedPackages,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
No, it's this piece of code in rpmlib lib/depends.c:~1450:
Got it …
mi = rpmtsInitIterator(ts, RPMTAG_PROVIDENAME, Name, 0);
(void)
On Sep 11, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Any idea why the code above isn't being traversed? I'm
missing something here, any help appreciated.
dep in question is of the TYPE_VERSION here, comes from package being
installed and it is 'mpd 0.16.5-4'
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Any idea why the code above isn't being traversed? I'm
missing something here, any help appreciated.
dep in question is of the TYPE_VERSION here, comes from
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl
wrote:
Looks it's not a ldconfig optimization that's the problem, just that
scriplets with only '-p /sbin/ldconfig'
On Sep 10, 2012, at 1:48 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Looks it's not a ldconfig optimization that's the problem, just that
scriplets with only '-p /sbin/ldconfig'
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
I'm getting the following message repeated many times when
(un)installing packages:
== warning: tag 1029 type(0x1) != implicit type(0x20002)
The data type field in
On Sep 9, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
I'm getting the following message repeated many times when
(un)installing packages:
==
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
I'm getting the following message repeated
On Sep 9, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
This warning shows up when processing rpm files or database created by our
old rpm 4.5.
Reinstall all the packages removes the need for the filtering.
RPMTAG_FILESTATES is populated/generated while installing
As
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
I see that other scripts are run because they fail when ldconfig is not
run for some of the packages in transaction set.
Repeatable
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
This warning shows up when processing rpm files or database created by our
old rpm 4.5.
Reinstall all the packages removes the need for the filtering.
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
I see that other scripts are run because they fail when ldconfig
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Any hints what should we expect?
Package spec files with localization will
build, but only the C locale will display.
As RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE is phased out, all
the code will be ripped out as well, including
the
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Looks it's not a ldconfig optimization that's the problem, just that
scriplets with only '-p /sbin/ldconfig' interpreter and empty body are
not run.
Function runInstScript() in lib/psm.c exits on 'headerGet(fi-,
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Looks it's not a ldconfig optimization that's the problem, just that
scriplets with only '-p /sbin/ldconfig' interpreter and empty body are
not run.
Function
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Instalation instructions:
0) backup rpm database in /var/lib/rpm
1) rpm -Fvh rpm* (obviously)
2) run /usr/lib/rpm/bin/dbconvert
3) run rpm --rebuilddb
That's
On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Instalation instructions:
0) backup rpm database in /var/lib/rpm
1) rpm -Fvh rpm* (obviously)
25 matches
Mail list logo
