Hello:
Build platform: openindiana (opensolaris build 147)
compiler : gcc 3.4.3
rpm5: rpm-5.2.1
1108 #ifdef _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
1109 struct dirent64 *d;
1110 union
{
1112 struct dirent64 d64;
Hello:
Compiler: gcc 3.4.3
rpm5: rpm-5.2.1
Platform: openindiana (opensolaris build 147).
When building rpm5, I get this error.
rpmmtree.c: In function `compare_nodes':
rpmmtree.c:1910: error: structure has no member named `st_mtimespec'
rpmmtree.c:1910: error: structure has no member named
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Hello:
Compiler: gcc 3.4.3
rpm5: rpm-5.2.1
Platform: openindiana (opensolaris build 147).
When building rpm5, I get this error.
rpmmtree.c: In function
What does the optional support for bzip2, LZMA, gzip, etc mean ?
When does it make sense to add support for these compression schemes ?
Does rpm5 take a decision to compress a file using a specific library
(e.g. bzip2 for binaries, gzip for text, etc) ?
Sriram
--
Hello:
For backward compatibility and collaboration reasons, the Belenix team
needs to pull in spec files that were created for pkgbuild.
For various reasons, the pkgbuild spec files have some extra tags that
make sense to pkgbuild. These are tags such as:
SUNW_BaseDir:
corresponds to
I'm unable to complete devtool checkout. I've been trying for the past
three hours.
-- Sriram
==
Belenix: www.belenix.org
__
RPM Package Managerhttp://rpm5.org
Developer
Hi:
While trying to get rpm-5.3.11 to compile on OpenIndiana build 147
(gcc 3.4.3), I faced the following error.
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I.. -I../build
-I../lib -I../lib -I../rpmdb -I../rpmio -I../misc -I../neon/src
-I../neon/src -I../neon -I../neon -I../pcre
Another C n00b question:
I faced this:
libtool: link: gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC -Wl,-z -Wl,text -Wl,-h
-Wl,librpmmisc-5.3.so -o .libs/librpmmisc-5.3.so .libs/librpmmisc.o
-R/workspace/rpm/rpm_5_3_11/beecrypt/.libs -R/usr/sfw/lib
-R/workspace/rpm/rpm_5_3_11/neon/src/.libs
also present
our modifications if any to rpm-de...@rpm4.org first.
-- Ram
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Another C n00b question:
I faced this:
libtool: link: gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC -Wl,-z -Wl,text
I have bdb 5.1.19 installed at /workspace/altopt/ (with sub folders
being include, bin, lib, etc).
/workspace/altopt/include contains db.h and dbsql.h
Here's a snippet of what I use to autogen and configure the rpm build process:
/bin/sh ./autogen.sh
./configure
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
I have bdb 5.1.19 installed at /workspace/altopt/ (with sub folders
being include, bin, lib, etc).
Note that there is a ABI breakage between db-5.1.19 - db-5.1.25. You
Hi:
I'm not able to fix this particular problem. Any help would be appreciated:
In rpmdb/rpmdb.h, I had to replace:
#if defined(_RPMDB_INTERNAL)
#if defined(WITH_DB)
#include db51/db.h
#else
#include db_emu.h
#endif
#endif
with
#include /usr/include/db51/db.h
Since CFLAGS=-I/usr/include and
I forgot to mention, I'm using ./devtool checkout, followed by
./devtool system and then make -j 2
-- Sriram
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.org wrote:
Hi:
I'm not able to fix this particular problem. Any help would be appreciated:
In rpmdb/rpmdb.h, I had
Hi again:
After placing a workaround to a reference to db51/db.h, I see the
build stuck at another point:
libtool: link: gcc -fPIC -DPIC -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-char-subscripts
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wformat-security -g3
Hi all:
I got rpm 5.3.11 to build. Here are the output of a make check.
I've not provided either tomcrpyt or nss yet, so I can understand those
errors.
Can someone please help interpret the rest of the test errors ? I'm assuming
that check-acid, check-am and check-recursive below are all
Thanks for your responses, Jeff. My own responses inline.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 16, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I've sometimes seen your responses posts where you talk about Have it
your won way
Hi:
I'm facing a problem with the smart package manager downloading the
createrepo based metadata, but not showing me any packages.
Anders F Bjorklund on the smart package manager mailing list gave a
few pointers, most of which I'd already applied.
He also pointed out to me that I should have
Thanks for your responses, everyone.
I had to place i86pc-pc-Solaris in /etc/rpm/platform (I'm using a 32
bit build for the time being).
I also had to place /etc/rpm/macros and customize the following:
%_arch i86pc
%_build_arch i86pc
%_vendor pc
%_os
-manager
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.org
Date: Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: About dpkg and apt-get
To: Belenix Developers belenix-...@opensolaris.org
All:
Summary: I asked Garrett D'Amore of Nexenta/Illumos on Nexenta's
choice of using dpkg
Some questions:
How is this different from the git structure that fedora use?
Are you referring to a form of continuous integration?
-- Sriram
On 9/11/11, P. Christeas x...@hellug.gr wrote:
Given your project's interest in next-generation packaging, I'd like to
present you with my technique.
Thanks for the heads up, Jeff!
-- Sriram
On 1/11/12, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
The @rpm5.org project uses Launchpad for ROADMAP planning
(and bug reporting and release purposes) here:
http://launchpad.net/rpm
While its anyone's guess whether Mandriva will close
its doors
21 matches
Mail list logo
