It is not so important, but in the previous patch if ID is empty RPMCANON.. is
not set, now it is set to the empty string instead. Sure it is unlikely this
can happen.
Best regards
Messaggio originale
Da: Jeff Johnson
Inviato: 26/08/2013, 23:42
A: rpm-...@rpm5.org
Oggetto: [CVS] RPM:
Neon upstream, the same version that rpm use in cvs, have a Makefile.in in test
and no Makefile.am. And i have problem in ubuntu 12.04 to do devtool ubuntu or
devtool static. Ok, ok, i will fill a Bug on lauchpad.
Aside
i can check better, but rpm cvs neon have a Makefile.am that doesn't
Hello jbj. I try to be carefull
Always. I have looked to the code first, and make check doesn't have
regression.
Sure it is a useless warning from the coverity scan, almost from a security
point of view. But dropping it don't harm, apparently. As always free to
revert, no problem for me. But
Fwiw, good patch and very good , better of i can have seen so far, description
of the issue on rpm5 lauchpad bugtracker.
Best
Messaggio originale
Da: Jeff Johnson
Inviato: 07/08/2013, 19:44
A: rpm-...@rpm5.org
Oggetto: [CVS] RPM: rpm-5_4: rpm/rpmio/ macro.c
RPM Package Manager,
The abf repo is more active yes. I have switched only because many corporate
firewall block the plain svn transport - webdav. No problem to revert if
necessary.
Thanks
Messaggio originale
Da: Jeffrey Johnson
Inviato: 01/08/2013, 19:43
A: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
Cc: rpm-...@rpm5.org
I know very well. Only a time problem, tomorrow i will merge.
Thanks
Messaggio originale
Da: Jeffrey Johnson
Inviato: 01/08/2013, 19:16
A: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
Cc: rpm-...@rpm5.org
Oggetto: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm-5_4: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/doc/ rpm.8
FWIW, rpm man pages are maintained in docbook
I am sorry. I am trying to merge manually some old patches from the popt 1.17
branch to HEAD and have conflict, dunno why. Thanks for checking, jbj.
Best
Messaggio originale
Da: Jeff Johnson
Inviato: 02/07/2013, 18:16
A: rpm-...@rpm5.org
Oggetto: [CVS] RPM: popt/ system.h
RPM
Messaggio originale
Da: Jeff Johnson
Inviato: 29/06/2013, 08:42
A: rpm-...@rpm5.org
Oggetto: [CVS] RPM: rpm-5_4: rpm/build/ parsePrep.c
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Messaggio originale
Da: Dmitry V. Levin
Inviato: 21/04/2012, 16:07
A: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
Oggetto: Re: refined implementation of set-versions
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:27:13PM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
There another option, however. For the reason which shall remain
nameless, I
Sorry for the top posting. I think @rpm5.org is glad of this. Just a, perhaps
naive, question : What mean for a package manager to be more zfs-aware ? Thanks
and best regards.
Messaggio originale
Da: Sriram Narayanan
Inviato: 03/09/2011, 18:59
A: rpm-devel; rpm-us...@rpm5.org
Oggetto:
Perhaps OT, but just a my random thought about this thread about rpm5 and
berkley DB. most of which is discussed here is very similar, or equal sometime,
on similar question on openldap. Apparently strange but not so quite if someone
think carefully at the rpm5 rpm acid feature. Just for
Perhaps OT, but just a my random thought about this thread about rpm5 and
berkley DB. most of which is discussed here is very similar, or equal sometime,
on similar question on openldap. Apparently strange but not so quite if someone
think carefully at the rpm5 rpm acid feature. Just for
If i have undestood this problem, Seems related to what i have trying to do
in popt HEAD as clamav does, not the best autofu implementation as it broke
opensolaris popt HEAD build. My bad. Tomorrow i will try to fix. Regards
Messaggio originale
Da: Jeff Johnson
Inviato: 09/06/2011,
Messaggio originale
Da: Robert Xu
Inviato: 23/05/2011, 19:28
A: devzero2000
Cc: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
Oggetto: Re: Added BRANCH OPENSUSE11FACTORY/rpm-4.9.0-122 on devzero2000 git
hub space
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:21, devzero2000 pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
If someone care i
Thanks. Two point. However. First, Why have you deleted my changelog ? Second,
Imnsho it is better to tell the origin of the change: translation project,
yourself, other ? Regards
Messaggio originale
Da: Matthew Dawkins
Inviato: 01/05/2011, 19:36
A: rpm-...@rpm5.org
Oggetto: [CVS] RPM:
Exists perhaps a written specificaton for suggest, raccomend other that was
discussed many time - Almost from 7 years now - on rpm-maint, the old
rpm-devel, also on lwn.net ( if my memory is good in origin was suggest =
missing sense ok ). On debian the desiderated answer depends from depsolver
Perhaps also in maximum rpm cvs ?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Johnson
Sent: 05/03/2011, 18:33
To: rpm-...@rpm5.org
Subject: [CVS] RPM: rpm-5_3: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/doc/ rpm2cpio.8
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Fwiw, i thing buildboot are a good thing , and, if one have only scary resource
, require a big work. But rpm5 is ported in so many platform - ubuntu 11.04
alpha for example - so the work is necessary. I am doing, in a private cloud,
something Similar but it is useless to have exactly the same
Beware, that if the update is not in the translation project at the next update
it is possible that this update will be overwitritten, In fact i have also Some
update possible from transiflex, checked today, but i have not idea how to
resolve possible conflict, but perhaps i miss something
Hi, i have checked mire.c and there is none difference from 5.3 and 5.4. So
perhaps a autofu issue is possible, difficult that i can do a MandrivaUpdate
without a problem on cokker with a such apparently evident problem with 5.3.6.
Can you post your configure invocation, configure log. Regards
I can put a backported patch here that use a configure option for disabling
this, imho a simple patch, if interested. Regards
-Original Message-
From: Stew Benedict
Sent: 25/02/2011, 13:44
To: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
Subject: Re: enable strict parentdir checking in 5.3.8?
On 02/24/2011
I know perfectly your Opinion. My self was, perhaps 4 years ago, against to
disabling tout court this feature. for this i have put a blueprint for this and
Some time ago i have committed this change on HEAD. Probably i have missed your
thought on these change . I have belenix and openindiana in
22 matches
Mail list logo
