Eliminating internal zlib.

2008-08-18 Thread Jeff Johnson
Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous. Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason not to start this effort, and am fighting dueling -lz - -lrpmz if building --without-neon

Re: Eliminating internal zlib.

2008-08-18 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 18:15:53 (-0400), Jeff Johnson wrote: Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous. Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason not to start this

Re: Eliminating internal zlib.

2008-08-18 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Eliminating internal zlib., Jeff Johnson said (at 6:15pm on...: Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? Yes, please. Tim -- Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076

Re: Eliminating internal zlib.

2008-08-18 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 00:15:53 Jeff Johnson wrote: Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous. Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason not to start this effort, and am