Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal
zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous.
Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason
not
to start this effort, and am fighting dueling -lz - -lrpmz if
building --without-neon
On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 18:15:53 (-0400),
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal
zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous.
Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason not
to start this
In regard to: Eliminating internal zlib., Jeff Johnson said (at 6:15pm on...:
Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4?
Yes, please.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 00:15:53 Jeff Johnson wrote:
Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal
zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous.
Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason
not
to start this effort, and am