Thank you!On Oct 11, 2011, at 05:02 AM, Pinto Elia devzero2...@rpm5.org wrote: RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Server: rpm5.org Name: Pinto Elia
Root:
Adding an envvar to every scriptlet environment is one helluva way
to pass a value to a single script.
Modify the find-debuginfo.sh script to take a path argument instead.
Even better: fix the script to use `pwd` and execute with the
same CWD as every other scriptlet run by rpmbuild.
hth
73 de
xrealloc please so that there's no need to check NULL.
empty statement semi-colons on next line as well. even better, move tmp++
out of the for statement:
for (i = 0; (tmp = strchr(tmp, '-')); i++, tmp++);
There's no reason for advocacy/apology hack in comments either.
Stating
Thank you!
I looked a bit at the code this weekend before deciding that
#ifdef RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA
…
#endif
is none of my business.
This is is a polite way of saying:
WTF?!? I know you can code better than what I am seeing here …
Even if you MUST hack around
On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Den 17:39 21. oktober 2011 skrev Jeff Johnson j...@rpm5.org følgende:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Server: rpm5.org
On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi there,
Whilst working on Poky/OpenEmbedded I found the need to list all of the hard
dependencies of an RPM package within a shell script. Unfortunately --requires
or the REQUIRES tag seem to also include soft dependencies (i.e.
On Dec 22, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Den 13:24 22. desember 2011 skrev Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com følgende:
)
Here's a recent patch of mine coming from past discussions about the subject:
On Dec 22, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Den 13:24 22. desember 2011 skrev Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com følgende:
Hi there,
Whilst working on Poky/OpenEmbedded I found the need to list all of the hard
dependencies of an RPM package within a shell script.
On Dec 22, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 22 December 2011 08:56:16 Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
After a little digging I found REQUIREFLAGS, here's an example listing
from
our system:
Good (though working with shell processing --qf output is gonna be AWKward
;-)
SHort
On Dec 22, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 12/22/11 7:56 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi there,
Whilst working on Poky/OpenEmbedded I found the need to list all of the hard
dependencies of an RPM package within a shell script
On Dec 22, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
jbj, would it be reasonable to add a context format specific to the
dependency flags? Similar to the fflags so we get a pretty print out of
the flag values?
I forgot to mention the most obvious solution:
Add an analogue
On Dec 26, 2011, at 7:28 AM, Mei, Lei wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that we have nine db files __db.00* under /var/lib/rpm when
we use rpm5 first time, and their capacity near 200MB, are they necessary?
But in some little disk(for embedded usage), disk space is not sufficient, so
should
On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On Aug 30, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hello,
The concept of rpmrepo really appeals to me. It seems like the 'Right' way
to generate repo metadata. What better place to compute and discover rpm
data than within the rpm
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Well broken is perhaps a bit harsh as a euphemism for
Not useful to you.
;-) included just in case; I don't believe we disagree here.
Chalk it down to perhaps a misunderstanding
The @rpm5.org project uses Launchpad for ROADMAP planning
(and bug reporting and release purposes) here:
http://launchpad.net/rpm
While its anyone's guess whether Mandriva will close
its doors on January 16th (I think not), Launchpad
is also in use for planning the deployment of RPM
This MANDATORY signature checking policy will be implemented/released
in rpm-5.4.7 this month.
Begin forwarded message:
RPM is going to change to a MANDATORY signature
checking policy this month.
That means that _ALL_ packages MUST be signed: rpm
will either skip or abort (withe
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeffrey Johnson n3...@mac.com
Subject: Macro configuration refactoring
Date: February 15, 2012 11:57:43 AM EST
To: coo...@mandrivalinux.org
As part of resuming active development, previous
tasks that were suspended while assisting with rpm-5.3
On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:07 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
This results in files being installed into $pkglibdir, which now will
be /usr/lib64/rpm.. :|
AH so that's how make distcheck got screwed. Thanks.
I chose to use a more appropriate new name as well in my fix:
On Feb 20, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
+o=PyInt_FromLong(he-tag);
+if (!o) {
+headerFreeIterator(hi);
Ehhk!
This shoulda rather been 'headerFini(hi);'
Fixed.
Meanwhile the real problem here isn't that a merge mistake
was found
On Mar 15, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Allen S. Rout wrote:
Thanks for your thoughtful reply!
On 03/15/2012 11:50 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
You can find me on
rpm-devel@rpm5.org
if you wish to continue the discussion. I am moderated (aka censored
onrpm-l...@rpm.org for (my guess
On Mar 15, 2012, at 7:13 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Allen S. Rout wrote:
Thanks for your thoughtful reply!
On 03/15/2012 11:50 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
You can find me on
rpm-devel@rpm5.org
if you wish to continue the discussion. I am
NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when released if
I don't get sucked into some CVE black hole) will propagate the
change
On Apr 6, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when
On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
I don't think changing devtool.conf to a db version that actually
exists/works is going to change that, but thanks for the warning.
./rpmdb/rpmdb.h:435: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
On Apr 20, 2012, at 8:12 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
I have just learnt that rpm5 project has borrowed set-string
implementation recently from ALT Linux. At the very same time, I was
working on on a new and improved encoding scheme which can make
On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:27 AM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
The methods in the existing encoding/decoding are in rpmio/set.c @rpm5.org:
the algorithm
is unchanged from Alt.
A change to the existing scheme over the next few
On Apr 21, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
I have just learnt that rpm5 project has borrowed set-string
implementation recently from ALT Linux. At the very same time,
On Apr 21, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:27:13PM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
There another option, however. For the reason which shall remain
nameless, I find it tempting to produce the new and incompatible
format without any clear signs of
On Apr 21, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:53:44AM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
[...]
Good: I knew you were sane ;-)
I hope I am. :)
[...]
Because of the (largely aesthetic) choice of set: as a syntax
marker for set:versions in statements like
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Matthew Dawkins mdawk...@rpm5.org wrote:
@@ -1128,6 +1132,12 @@
}
}
+ /* XXX ugly quick dirty integration of haskell() dependencies */
+ { fn = strstr(fc-fn[fc-ix], /usr/share/haskell-deps);
+ if (fn)
+
On Apr 22, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Dmitry V. Levin l...@altlinux.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 02:28:29PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
[...]
1) strstr(3) has hidden state that WILL break
with multithreading. And the proper fix isn't
to just use strstr_r(3).
Isn't strstr(3
On Apr 22, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Dmitry V. Levin l...@altlinux.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 02:28:29PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
[...]
1) strstr(3) has hidden state that WILL break
with multithreading
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Dmitry V. Levin l...@altlinux.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:21:18PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
[...]
There's 124 patches in Mandriva Cooker headed towards
@rpm5.org in need of review. This check-in was the first
tentative step forward.
Wouldn't
On Apr 26, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
But set:versions looks quite useful, and far more effective at reducing the
number
of dependencies than attempting a pin-hole optimizations with boolean
expressions, discarding inequalities which are implied by other
dependencies,
On Apr 28, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
2012/4/28 Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com:
Well your overlapping dependencies removal checked in upstream is about
to get ripped out for lack of generality and bugginess.
Confirmed not upstream (whatever that means: increasingly I
I haven't any idea what the intent here is: I'm pretty sure its stuff
ported from @rpm.org by Pinto Elia.
Which is fine … _EXCEPT_ … there's extra dependencies
being added that are causing most of scripts/* to be erased,
likely because of a twisted/recursive Makefile dependencies.
I don't see
On May 8, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Nitin A Kamble wrote:
Attached patch fixes build of rpm with automake 1.12
Thanks for the patch.
I think there's both automake-1.11.2 and automake-1.12 fixes.
But rpm-5.4.9 released this morning here
On May 9, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Anders F Björklund a...@rpm5.org wrote:
Matthew Dawkins:
Announcing the release of rpm-5.4.9-0.20120508.src.rpm
...
Enjoy and please report back any errors and problems.
The ltmain.sh has some mandriva hack to it, that breaks the build:
ld: unknown
Matthew Dawkins mentioned an interest in better python module
dependencies in RPM earlier today.
A google search for python module dependency graph shows
some reasonably serious efforts to create reliable (i.e. not
*RE's scraping use … statements out of *.pl) dependencies.
Perhaps best-of-breed
On May 11, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Matthew Dawkins mentioned an interest in better python module
dependencies in RPM earlier today.
There was a half-hearted attempt at this, earlier on:
http://afb.users.sourceforge.net/rpm/pythondeps.py
Nice
On May 11, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu wrote:
In regard to: Requires: python(foo) = bar, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 2:11pm...:
Matthew Dawkins mentioned an interest in better python module
dependencies in RPM earlier today.
I'm still running rpm 5.1.9 and meaning
On May 11, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu wrote:
In regard to: Requires: python(foo) = bar, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 2:11pm...:
Matthew Dawkins mentioned an interest in better python module
dependencies in RPM earlier today.
I'm still running rpm 5.1.9 and meaning
On May 11, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote:
On 5/11/12 1:11 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Matthew Dawkins mentioned an interest in better python module
dependencies in RPM earlier today.
A google search for python module dependency graph shows
some reasonably
Mark Hatle pointed out that its impossible to perform
the query in the subject this morning.
The PACKAGEORIGIN tag contains the path that was given to
the rpm when a package was installed. The intended use is/was
extend the tracking of a package persistently, back to the
original URI used when
On May 12, 2012, at 4:04 AM, Anders F Björklund a...@rpm5.org wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
I used http://docs.python.org/library/modulefinder.html
and then filtered out some boring ones like sys and os.
Yes modulefinder included in python is the right starting point.
I'd stub
On May 16, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote:
I'm having problems enabling ossp uuid support with RPM5.
Both util-linux and ossp-uuid want to provide a /usr/lib/pkgconfig/uuid.pc
file. Since ossp-uuid is the alternative on my system, I'd like to avoid
the
On May 17, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Mark Hatle wrote:
I'm having problems enabling ossp uuid support with RPM5.
Both util-linux and ossp-uuid want to provide a /usr/lib/pkgconfig/uuid.pc
file. Since ossp-uuid is the alternative on my system, I'd like to avoid
the
On May 17, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
Choosing the One True Name in AutoFu would require an
extra level of testing of *.pc/*-config/*.la to tell if the just
found information is useful (and that isn't erasable to attempt
On May 17, 2012, at 1:05 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
In the end I had to put in a sed on the generated configure:
sed -e 's/pkg-config --exists uuid/pkg-config --exists ossp-uuid/' -e
's/pkgconfig uuid/pkgconfig ossp-uuid/' -i configure
And at least it's doing what I want right now, but
Eeek … all that is needed is avoiding a systematic bias
when setting MALLOC_PERTURB_.
Even $$ alone suffices to avoid the bias:
expr \( $$ % 255 \) + 1
hth
73 de Jeff
On May 28, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Pinto Elia wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
On Apr 23, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I should point out that writing the attached
message (and sending from the wrong e-mail address) has instantly
led to a different -- and perhaps more natural -- syntax like
Requires: set(libfoo.so.1) = whatever
After a month of
On May 30, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
OK, I'm in the last stages of adding twiddle-in-version so its time to
consider other changes:
1) Epoch as a string? The only lossage here is when digit strings
On May 30, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jeff Johnson n3npq@gmail.com wrote:
I should point out that writing the attached
message (and sending from the wrong e-mail address) has instantly
led to a different -- and
On May 30, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
We are in violent agreement here over a minor issue
of implementation/representation.
By the way, actual problems that will arise are rarely
On May 31, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:56:20PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Apr 23, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I should point out that writing the attached
message (and sending from the wrong e-mail address) has instantly
led
On May 31, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
I'm trying to understand rpmsetcmp() as a black box independent
of all the gory implementation details of ELF symbols, base62 encoding,
and RPM dependencies.
I believe that set:versions are much like Bloom filters:
1) strings
On Jun 11, 2012, at 2:55 AM, Rajasekhar wrote:
Problem :
Unable to install the kernel rpm when we are trying to install the
rpm via our customized backend library .
This case is observed when we have two kernels already installed and
we are trying to install the third kernel
On Jun 14, 2012, at 6:49 AM, Rajasekhar wrote:
The rpm version we are using is 4.8 and platform is RHEL6 and the
valgrind output is attached. This issue we are observing only we have
two kernels already installed already on the machine and with one
kernel the transaction going just fine .
On Jun 15, 2012, at 11:58 PM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
I asked 2 very specific questions … the rest is quite important also,
but I need to understand precisely what properties set:versions have in order
to implement correctly
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Rajasekhar wrote:
Thanks very much for you suggestion . Although we are using headerLink
in our code ,the problem seems to be the way we are calling it .In
our code we are looking for hdrVec, a globally exported virtual
function table and finding the
On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:51 AM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Alexey Tourbin
alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
Good: the above confirmation of the characteristics allows a set:versions
implementation
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
The contained in or subset semantic that applies to the operations and
=
is rather easy to do as well. E.g. if (assuming on;y existence, not versioned
inequality ranges)
P == Bloom filter of Provides: tokens
R == Bloom
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:27 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
More precisely, a set-version can be (in principle) converted to a
Bloom filter which uses only one hash function. The idea is that such
a filter
On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
Sure numbers make sense.
But God invented 0 and 1 and who needs steenkin carries to do
arithmetic in Galois fields?!?
Jeffery, I understand
On Jun 22, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
I would state that compression (of any sort) to minimize
bandwidth is entirely the wrong problem to solve.
So what kind of a problem are we
On Jun 23, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
There are lots of usage cases for efficient sub-set computations
in package management, not just as a de facto API/ABI check
using ELF symbols
On Jun 23, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Jun 23, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
…
Perhaps making base61 encoding MANDATORY in rpm would displease
everyone equally: choosing a prime is as pretty as all other
encoding criteria
On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
There is also a philosophical consideration which somehow accompanies
this practical consideration. There is a short story, I believe by
Borges, where a clever scientist devises a 1-1 map of reality. A 1-1
map of reality turns out to be a
On Jun 28, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
The downside is, of course, that when a dependency R subset P is
broken, it is not easy to find out which P symbols were deleted or
renamed (or which R symbols are missing). But this is largely a
developer's, or should I say a hacker's,
On Jul 1, 2012, at 11:43 PM, Alexey Tourbin alexey.tour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
In the interest of getting off negative nerdy obscure discussions, let's
try a positive alternative application for Golob-Rice subset operations
On Jul 2, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
All RPMv4.4+ packages, that is, but not RPMv4.0. I find this file
coloring business very annoying, by the way, and it took me some time
to realize that fc actually stands
On Jul 17, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I'm attempting to write a simple C program to query the RPM database, using
the headers and libraries from RPM 5.4.9. After digging through various
pieces
of source code and documentation,
On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 09:14:36 Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Instead of relying on rpmmiCount, just do your own count.
I wasn't really relying upon it, I was trying to use it as a diagnostic to see
if I was actually getting any data back. I
On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote:
This process is rather inefficient. For a number of reasons we don't use
zypper
or anything similar to do dependency resolution for rootfs construction, so
we
have to do it manually using a solve database we can
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 16:57:30 Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
This API gives direct access to the secondary
keys without the need to load headers from the
primary Packages data store:
/** \ingroup rpmdb
* Return
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
So I'm now doing this:
--- snip -
rpmts ts = NULL;
rpmdb db = NULL;
int rc;
ARGV_t keys = NULL;
rpmReadConfigFiles( NULL, NULL );
char *dbpathm = malloc(strlen(argv[1]) + 10);
On Aug 13, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
Hi there,
Following my previous request for assistance with performing rpm db queries
from C with rpm 5.4.9 (thanks for the help with that!), I put together the
following utility:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Instalation instructions:
0) backup rpm database in /var/lib/rpm
1) rpm -Fvh rpm* (obviously
On Sep 9, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
I'm getting the following message repeated many times when
(un)installing packages
On Sep 9, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
This warning shows up when processing rpm files or database created by our
old rpm 4.5.
Reinstall all the packages removes the need for the filtering.
RPMTAG_FILESTATES is populated/generated while installing
As
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
I see that other scripts are run because they fail when ldconfig
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Any hints what should we expect?
Package spec files with localization will
build, but only the C locale will display.
As RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE is phased out, all
the code will be ripped out as well, including
the
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Looks it's not a ldconfig optimization that's the problem, just that
scriplets with only '-p /sbin/ldconfig' interpreter and empty body are
not run.
Function runInstScript() in lib/psm.c exits on 'headerGet(fi-,
On Sep 10, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the assertion failure when trying to install certain
package, here is the log from 'rpm -Uvvvh mksh-40d-3.x86_64.rpm',
mksh has Obsoletes:pdksh, thus pdksh uninstall:
D: pool fd: created size 392 limit -1 flags 0
D:
On Sep 10, 2012, at 1:48 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Looks it's not a ldconfig optimization that's the problem, just that
scriplets with only '-p /sbin/ldconfig
On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-5.4.10-0.12.x86_64
The problem comes from mpd and stunnel have Provides user(%{name}) and
group(%{name}), and rpm mixes RPMNS_TYPE_USER/RPMNS_TYPE_GROUP namespace
deps with RPMNS_TYPE_VERSION(?)
On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
No, it's this piece of code in rpmlib lib/depends.c:~1450:
Got it …
mi = rpmtsInitIterator(ts, RPMTAG_PROVIDENAME, Name, 0);
(void) rpmmiPrune(mi,
ts-removedPackages,
On Sep 11, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Any idea why the code above isn't being traversed? I'm
missing something here, any help appreciated.
dep in question is of the TYPE_VERSION here, comes from package being
installed and it is 'mpd 0.16.5-4'
On Sep 12, 2012, at 2:56 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:06:45PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
There's no well defined semantic for
Provides: group(mpd)
even if PLD has adopted some convention afaik. The
Provides: group(mpd)
is just
On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
But this isn't the time/pace to discuss relative merits
of user/group management … the rpmdsCompare needs to
be extended to include the namespace in the comparison.
Would something like
On Sep 14, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
Hi,
When I queried rpm for package that owns a file, rpm4 resolved
all symlinks in queried path, while rpm5 does not.
For example /usr/src/linux usage:
$ ls -ld /usr/src/linux
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Sep 14
On Oct 4, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi guys,
the type in a rpm package created with rpm5 always seems to be 0
(binary rpm), even if it's a source rpm. This confuses tools like
'file' that determine the rpm type from the lead.
Is that an intended change or
Nice. Thanks!
73 de Jeff
On May 2, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Anders F. Björklund a...@rpm5.org wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Server: rpm5.org Name: Anders
On May 5, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
1.1.2.8 +64 -57 rpm/rpmio/set.c
Nice. Thanks!
I suppose one could conditionalize it - if there was enough of a
performance hit and interest in doing so. Just wanted to use clang.
Portability
On Jun 27, 2013, at 8:40 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
I imagine that the resolutions of the Coverity vulnerability issue to
rpm5 bundled programs as beecrypt, thanks to the great work of the
rpm5 maintainer, are then brought back upstream. Should not it?
I'm not sure whether there is an active
de Jeff
Cheers,
Bob
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
On Jun 27, 2013, at 8:40 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
I imagine that the resolutions of the Coverity vulnerability issue to
rpm5 bundled programs as beecrypt, thanks to the great work
There's something strange going on with executing testit.sh on Mac OS X.
Below are 3 different invocations, 1 of which fails, 1 of which succeeds,
and the make check variant which is likely pretending to Just Work.
I looked but cannot see the flaw in testit.sh yet
hth
73 de Jeff
falmouth:popt
On Jul 5, 2013, at 4:41 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
Beware that ./devtool standalone use old version of some tool of the
buildchain, as gettext. And ./devtool static is borken on ubuntu
12.04.2 LTS
, for me almost, The build fail - Makefile.in not found - found today.
I did not understand why.
On Jul 31, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Attached you'll find a couple of patches fixing regressions in rpm 5.4.12.
The first patch is a lua, not an rpm, problem.
Your 2nd patch introduces a memory leak: every pointer passed is malloc'd.
Another regression I'm more puzzled
On Jul 31, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Attached you'll find a couple of patches fixing regressions in rpm 5.4.12.
The first patch is wrong. Just #undef NODEV as defined by sys/param.h
Thanks, applied.
See attached patch for lua
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
