Re: The state of LSB Packaging?

2010-05-20 Thread Jeff Johnson
On May 20, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote: On Thursday 20 May 2010 10:03:55 Denis Washington wrote: How does that sound? A bit like some ideas I have regarding packaging for ISV ;-) : http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2010/UniversalPackageForIsv I proposed this for Google

Re: The state of LSB Packaging?

2010-05-19 Thread Denis Washington
Am 19.05.2010 19:24, schrieb Jeff Johnson: On May 19, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Denid Washington wrote: I'm still willing to help however I can with LSB+RPM. Its _INSANE_ to continue futile Packaging War battles and and no users benefit (but certainly distros/vendors benefit from de facto

The state of LSB Packaging?

2010-05-18 Thread Denid Washington
Hi, You might remember me - I'm the one who wrote a sketchy implementation of the then-discussed Berlin Packaging API about two years ago [1]. I have shifted my focus to other things since then, but since recently have more time again and my interest on the topic has been sparked again. Now