On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, 趙惟倫 wrote:
Hello,
In attachment there is the zh_TW locale file for rpm
Maybe you should also delete the empty zh.po and zh_CN.GB2312.po
Hi,
Thanks for the translation! Committed, and those empty zh and zh_CN.GB2312
removed (they weren't getting built anyway but...)
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 16:16 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
While I don't personally see a big deal in who's the owner of the files in
src.rpm's, various people apparently do, for various reasons. By the looks
of it, doesn't change existing behavior unless actually used so it's
harmless
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 15:56 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I can kinda see the point behind this, but it's just scary. Wouldn't
this be a job for iconv or something instead?
Further, as pointed out here by JBJ, it doesn't really solve the problem
of potentially having multiple encodings
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:31 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Just my two cents, it's worthwhile for everyone to remain compatible w/
the tag numbers.
Keeping tag numbers compatible is really worthwhile too.
And yes, it does work both ways.. but it has to be something done NOW,
not in two weeks.
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:45:59PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Whether this is 100% correct fix or not, but it seems to fix real
problems. Eg:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173285
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:00:16AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Please do. I'm not claiming you're not right, seeing the problem would
help *me* understand it properly :)
Say you have Jeff's rpmHeadersIdentical() in depend.cs. If you
have two
