> On 10. Oct 2017, at 22:32, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> We're planning on making this change for all of our distributions via
>> all of their distribution methods, for consistencies sake.
>> Given how we build our containers, we'd actually have to do extra work
>> to
On a freshly installed Fedora 27 system (RPM 4.14.0-rc2), DNF does not prompt
me to install keys even though they are missing (`f5282ee4` is the Fedora 27
key and manually importing it makes the warning go away):
```
warning: /var/cache/dnf/.../foo.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 03:41 PM, Richard Brown wrote:
> On 2017-10-10 20:05, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> > My opinion here boils down to: if rpm upstream is happy with
> > /usr/lib/rpmdb,
> > I'm happy to do the work of changing rpm-ostree to use that.
>
> That's great news, I'm happy to help if
On 2017-10-10 20:05, Colin Walters wrote:
My opinion here boils down to: if rpm upstream is happy with
/usr/lib/rpmdb,
I'm happy to do the work of changing rpm-ostree to use that.
That's great news, I'm happy to help if I can
(Longer version: I don't find the "sharable
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Richard Brown wrote:
> The discussion currently boils down to either copying rpm-ostree and placing
> our rpmdb in /usr/share/rpm, or
> locating it in /usr/lib/rpmdb
I definitely like the "db" suffix, makes it less of a potential naming clash if
librpm