I am not the original author of the patch (and also in the patch metadata it is
written that the author is unknown, but the maintainer says he doesn't remember
any contributions whose author is unknown, the most likely the patch should be
also attributed to him) but I guess that `tempfile`
Closed #986.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/986#event-2907357914___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #989.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/989#event-2907356880___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Even though the commit message looks like this (it have been inherited from the
patch file) I don't see this patch removing any calls. I can guess that the
most of the patch got missing (already merged?) but the text haven't been
changed.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed
Closed #988.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/988#event-2907351343___
Rpm-maint mailing list
It'd probably be better to use a POSIX sh-compatible way to use gettext instead
of straight up dropping internationalization capability.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I feel like this patch is just asking for trouble. Given that it touches the
debuginfo generation code, I'm not terribly comfortable passing judgment here.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This seems Debian specific? It also seems wholly unnecessary. This could
probably be dropped downstream too.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Why is this safe? And is this a universally available property?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This patch doesn't make sense to upstream. It also should just probably be
dropped downstream.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This has been forwarded before. We did this in a different form upstream with
the "dummy" backend. Using that by default in Debian will "break" rpm as Debian
wishes.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
In Debian, rpm should be used to install packages, but rather as a tool to
work with rpm packages or as a helper in alien. Because of this we protect
complain, when user tries to install a package. This warning can be hidden by
--force-debian.
Forwarded: http://rpm.org/ticket/79
…
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/installplatform-verbose.patch
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/988
-- Commit Summary --
* Verbose installplatform Just make
From:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/tempfile.patch
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/987
-- Commit Summary --
* Use the Debian standard (and safe) mechanism of
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/autogen-cleanup.patch
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/986
-- Commit Summary --
* Delete some crap after running autogen.
-- File Changes
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/map-populate.patch
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix compilation on platforms without MAP_POPULATE
-- File
There are no translations anyway...
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/bashism.patch
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984
-- Commit Summary --
* Do not use bashism for
17 matches
Mail list logo
