According to Fedora Packaging Guidelines, with static linking, the license tag
should actually contain license not only of software which is being compiled
but also licenses of all software being linked.
Do you think it would be possible to design some kind of generator for a
license?
We used to have coverity scans running on rpm. We might want to see if we can
get that restored...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1070#pullrequestreview-359353949___
@olafhering pushed 1 commit.
dddabb30a808a803d00d9543f09cf201eae85102 update OCaml requires/provides to
cover also cmx
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@olafhering pushed 1 commit.
9f04b41e653da201a6350b00482309d4be272519 update OCaml requires/provides to
cover also cmx
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@ignatenkobrain Three problems with it:
1. It would be regressive to current functionality for no good reason.
2. We don't have a way of distributing this in any kind of reasonable fashion
through rpm-extras.
3. IMO, That's not what rpm-extras is for. It's for staging things to
eventually
> @ignatenkobrain No, there's no reason to move it there.
Why not? It is better to split language-specific things into a rpm-extras.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Conan-Kudo commented on this pull request.
> +}
+#
+#
+usage() {
+echo >&2 "Usage: ${0##*/} -prov|-req [-f 'ocamlobjinfo cmd']"
+}
+#
+mode=
+ignore_implementation_a=()
+ignore_interface_a=()
+while test "$#" -gt 0
+do
+ : "${1}" "${2}"
+ case "${1}" in
+-prov) mode='prov' ;;
+
@ignatenkobrain No, there's no reason to move it there.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> While we are on it, shouldn't we move these to rpm-extras?
That is up to you guys. But this must be a separate SR.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
10 matches
Mail list logo
