[Rpm-maint] [PATCH v3] Allow '--short-circuit' for '-bb'

This patch allows short-circuiting of building binary packages. To prevent accidental use of short-circuited rpms, they are marked with an unsatisfiable dependency rpmlib(ShortCircuited). A developer using this feature for local development and testing will use --nodeps. Should such a rpm leak

Re: [Rpm-maint] Keep my name out of your discussions

A gentleman who wishes not to be named wrote: You have no right to discuss the state of my mind. I apologize for quoting a public message from you. I apologize for infering anything about your opinion from the fact that the software, of which you are the primary developer, has the feature. Good

[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Revert If there are no hardlinks, dont bother with s-bit and caps removal

Deciding whether it is necessary to remove the SUID bit based on the current link count creates an opportunity for a race condition. A hardlink could be created just between lstat() and chmod(). This reverts commit 89be57ad9239c9ada0cba94a5003876b456d46bf. --- lib/fsm.c |2 +- 1 files

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Allow '--short-circuit' for '-bb'

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:10:49 +0300 (EEST) Panu Matilainen wrote: I would consider applying a -bb/-bs --short-circuit enabling patch if the patch causes the resulting package to be poisoned, requiring some extra switch to be installable. The developer in case 1) who knows what [s]he's doing

[Rpm-maint] [PATCH v2] Allow '--short-circuit' for '-bb'

This patch allows short-circuiting of building binary packages. To prevent accidental use of short-circuited rpms, they are marked with an unsatisfiable dependency rpmlib(ShortCircuited). A developer using this feature for local development and testing will use --nodeps. Should such a rpm leak