Okay so related to the platform-python weirdness. That's a Fedora invention and
it's up to Fedora to patch around it if needed.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Merged #341.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/341#event-1313715435___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@pmatilai I had concern about this just because Python maintainers asked me to
use only `-s` for DNF..
> ... I suggest to add -s flag to the shebang until platform-python thing is
> resolved. This will prevent troubles caused by dnf being affected by Python
> packages installed by "sudo pip"
> I don't think that passing -E is good
Could you elaborate on that a bit, especially when you think -s /is/
good? Without -s, code from user site packages is loaded, potentially
interfering with the commands. Without -E, PYTHONPATH from environment
can be used to do exactly the same.
(If
ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
I don't think that passing -E is good (while -s is definitely good idea). We
are planning to do same for dnf, the only -s part... As requested by Python
maintainers
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
To limit environment and user home dir influence.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/341
-- Commit Summary --
* Invoke python-macro-helper with -Es python args
-- File Changes --
M macros.in (6)
M
