Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:44:06PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
So I'm a bit concerned that adding ...evl (or ...evb) is going to
be confusing in the name.
What we have done is called it armv5el_vfp.
I've considered that, but that breaks configure scripts that match
This is where package dependencies come in. If the package depends on a
hardware support for VFP, then the system needs to have a corresponding provide
or it won't install.
(Of course people can use --nodeps.. but similarly they can use --ignorearch.)
In RPM 4.4.x ARCH implies certain
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
(please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@)
The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if
the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building
and using VFP-optimised RPM packages for ARM
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
(please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@)
The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if
the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building
and using VFP-optimised
