Re: [Rpm-maint] allow to remove Requires(pre) or not?

2008-02-27 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Panu Matilainen wrote: On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Pixel wrote: as for me i'm not convinced that Requires(pre) not implying Requires is a feature. I would be in favor of Requires(xxx) implies Requires. Agreed, permitting remove of (pre|post|...)-only dependencies

Re: [Rpm-maint] allow to remove Requires(pre) or not?

2008-02-27 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Panu Matilainen wrote: On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Pixel wrote: as for me i'm not convinced that Requires(pre) not implying Requires is a feature. I would be in favor of Requires(xxx) implies Requires. Agreed, permitting

Re: [Rpm-maint] allow to remove Requires(pre) or not?

2008-02-26 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Pixel wrote: this must have been reported already: # rpm -qR b a # rpm -q --whatrequires a no package requires a # rpm -e a # rpm -V b Unsatisfied dependencies for b-1-1.noarch: Requires: a Yup, known thing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223642 rpm