Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't use _nl_msg_cat_cntr if __GLIC__ is not defined (PR #2856)

2024-01-23 Thread Panu Matilainen
Thanks for the patch! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2856#issuecomment-1905777264 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't use _nl_msg_cat_cntr if __GLIC__ is not defined (PR #2856)

2024-01-23 Thread Panu Matilainen
Merged #2856 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2856#event-11568363991 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't use _nl_msg_cat_cntr if __GLIC__ is not defined (PR #2856)

2024-01-23 Thread pastalian
@pastalian commented on this pull request. > @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int filerequireTag(Header h, rpmtd td, > headerGetFlags hgflags) /* I18N look aside diversions */ -#if defined(ENABLE_NLS) +#if defined(ENABLE_NLS) && (defined(__GLIBC__) || !defined(__linux__)) like this? -- Reply

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't use _nl_msg_cat_cntr if __GLIC__ is not defined (PR #2856)

2024-01-23 Thread pastalian
@pastalian pushed 1 commit. 68eefae75e63fb2a8f3b4a9253e73b6423ccd904 Don't use _nl_msg_cat_cntr if it's not available -- View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2856/files/da222f0d82721d17e57d491d2749a4bc44754b9d..68eefae75e63fb2a8f3b4a9253e73b6423ccd904 You are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't use _nl_msg_cat_cntr if __GLIC__ is not defined (PR #2856)

2024-01-23 Thread Panu Matilainen
@pmatilai commented on this pull request. > @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int filerequireTag(Header h, rpmtd td, > headerGetFlags hgflags) /* I18N look aside diversions */ -#if defined(ENABLE_NLS) +#if defined(ENABLE_NLS) && (defined(__GLIBC__) || !defined(__linux__)) AFAICS this isn't