Merged #2704 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2704#event-10628393339
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint
Tweaked a little bit to make the legacy status more prominent in the naming.
Just another small step towards sawing this unwanted limb off :smile:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2704#issuecomment-1759145173
You are
@pmatilai pushed 0 commits.
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2704/files/77c71398d93ede2bb636aca9f9038f78a52a54b7..c289eba9defacf550768c3cc5e64f17d72c7e6bc
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@pmatilai pushed 3 commits.
c289eba9defacf550768c3cc5e64f17d72c7e6bc Move internal OpenPGP parser into a
subdirectory
9b24d952dda0d8a42a7b325937a94d4d92b56dec Refactor internal PGP parser
pgpValStr() uses to use the public API
77c71398d93ede2bb636aca9f9038f78a52a54b7 Bury pgpValStr() inside
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
9aa8abb10ab12ccb9cf93327533a9f1cf00e97b2 Move internal OpenPGP parser into a
subdirectory
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2704/files/43d8557c30c1cc5d4618128bee5c0079205ced31..9aa8abb10ab12ccb9cf93327533a9f1cf00e97b2
You are
Having more modules does indeed complicate things, but then we're already in a
situation where we need to coordinate any API additions between rpm and
rpm-sequoia. It just hasn't really come up yet because ATM we're just bumping
the required rpm-sequoia version as we go, but at some point we'll
If we add new functions to the API, as suggested recently [in this
issue](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2689), then the
internal implementation will need to be updated. This will require a versioning
scheme for the API, I think, which would complicate maintenance.
To elaborate, the idea here is to split the new rpmpgp subdirectory into a
separate repository that can be pulled into the build for the "internal pgp"
support, but to eliminate it from the rpm repo and release tarballs. This
resolves #2414 as far as I'm concerned.
@mlschroe , you indicated
