Yes, the only real change needed here is the stored user/group. I doubt it
*ever* made sense, really
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2604#issuecomment-1720756475
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
> it would be useful to clamp the ownership of the files to root:root--though
> this will necessitate ensuring that the applications which work with RPM
> input/output respect this clamping and change the permissions if a user
> extracts or installs it. (Namely, we don't want a user to install
Indeed, storing the local user/group into src.rpm makes no sense whatsoever.
It's an anachronism from the ancient days before Buildroot was a thing that has
somehow survived all the way up to this date. We've made some effort to swipe
the symptoms under the carpet (ie avoid pointless warnings
