Hi,
The patch below contains a couple of minor bug fixes, which are supposed
to render currently non-buildable test programs buildable again.
Ralf
diff -r 425cce5ee453 rpmdb/tdbi.c
--- a/rpmdb/tdbi.c Sun Aug 05 11:30:55 2007 +0300
+++ b/rpmdb/tdbi.c Mon Aug 06 09:36:34 2007 +0200
@@ -25,7 +25,7
... and the next patch:
It addresses 2 related issues
* $(mkinstalldirs) in Makefile.ams is an anachronism.
Modern Makefile.ams should use $(MKDIR_P) instead.
* There is one direct call to mkdir -p inside of the toplevel
Makefile.am - mkdir -p is non-portable. Portable Makefile.ams should use
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
The patch below contains a couple of minor bug fixes, which are supposed
to render currently non-buildable test programs buildable again.
This + MKDIR_P and python patches all applied, thanks.
Regarding the test-stuff: much (almost all?) of them
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 07:24:36AM +, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Mark Hatle wrote:
Jeremy Sanders wrote:
Are there any plans to be able to host an RPM database over NFS? See
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Yu Zhiguo wrote:
Hello everybody,
I find a bug in the latest rpm release(rpm-4.4.2.1 from
http://www.rpm.org):
The description about option '--dump' in manpage is wrong.
The manpage says, This option must be used with at least one of -l, -c,
-d.,
but in fact,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:17 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
The patch below contains a couple of minor bug fixes, which are supposed
to render currently non-buildable test programs buildable again.
This + MKDIR_P and python patches all
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:17 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
The patch below contains a couple of minor bug fixes, which are supposed
to render currently non-buildable test programs buildable again.
This
.. and yet another one:
Use PACKAGE_BUGREPORT in rpmrc.c's error messages.
Background: autoconf supplies a define (PACKAGE_BUGREPORT) which can be
used to provide an email-address for bug reporting. So far, rpmrc.c
sources used a hard-coded addresses instead.
This had caused i18n'ed strings
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
.. and yet another one:
Use PACKAGE_BUGREPORT in rpmrc.c's error messages.
Background: autoconf supplies a define (PACKAGE_BUGREPORT) which can be
used to provide an email-address for bug reporting. So far, rpmrc.c
sources used a hard-coded addresses
... today's flood continues ...
The patch below removes AC_CANONICAL_TARGET from configure.ac and
changes $target to $host.
Background: AC_CANONICAL_TARGET is supposed to take the target of a
cross-tool, not the target of cross-compiling a package
(== a configure script's --host).
Older
Umm... yes it is.
I use RPM to cross-compile software ever day. I also cross compile RPM
from one target to another routinely. You need to keep the $target
references or you will make the rpm.org version of RPM unable to be
cross compiled.
--Mark
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
... today's flood
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:02 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Umm... yes it is.
I use RPM to cross-compile software ever day. I also cross compile RPM
from one target to another routinely. You need to keep the $target
references or you will make the rpm.org version of RPM unable to be
cross
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:02 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Umm... yes it is.
I use RPM to cross-compile software ever day. I also cross compile RPM
from one target to another routinely. You need to keep the $target
references or you will make the rpm.org version of RPM
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:26 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:02 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
Umm... yes it is.
I use RPM to cross-compile software ever day. I also cross compile RPM
from one target to another routinely. You need to keep the $target
The easiest way to check this. (Conceptually.. tailor to suit)
On a non-linux host, such as solairs, configure to run on a linux host.
If you following the paths through configure, you'll see it checks and
hardcodes values based on the settings. I'm not an autoconf expert so
I'll leave which
15 matches
Mail list logo