Re: [Rpm-maint] discussion on problems of RPM in real life packaging

2008-06-17 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Seth Vidal wrote: %pretans plays all sorts of hell with chroot installs. We tend to discourage them as much as possible. Why they are different than %post in chroot? I guess that there were some implementation problems in rpm, for example: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235361

Re: [Rpm-maint] discussion on problems of RPM in real life packaging

2008-06-17 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Pixel wrote: Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Using %preun is acceptable only for uninstallation, not for upgrade. But this is yet another problem mentioned in the document, not related to one-time-scriptlets. oops, right. mandriva never went that far :)

Re: [Rpm-maint] discussion on problems of RPM in real life packaging

2008-06-17 Thread Pixel
Seth Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Pixel wrote: However I can imagine an one-time unsubscription counterpart (something, which will evaluate list of all files going to be removed or overwritten in the forthcoming transaction and then issue a command with a such list.