Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "PyCapsule_New called with null pointer" when get package header (#114)

Fixed in commit 34b61a1f82f6f9b675ab4ca820b6255af63680f1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "PyCapsule_New called with null pointer" when get package header (#114)

Closed #114. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/114#event-975735400___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] add brp helper scripts from mandriva's spec-helper (#122)

I've nothing against adding more brp-scripts as such, I haven't looked at this in any detail but there seems to be useful stuff in there. Enabling such a big pile of new stuff by default is a wholly different question, but lets not get hung up on that. The other complaint wrt enablement is

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow better usage of %trace mode in rpmspec -P (#161)

Closed #161. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/161#event-975960965___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow better usage of %trace mode in rpmspec -P (#161)

Thanks for the patches. Merged. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/161#issuecomment-282279613___ Rpm-maint mailing

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Bounds check strings to print correctly in %trace mode. (#160)

Closed #160. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/160#event-975961542___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Bounds check strings to print correctly in %trace mode. (#160)

Added as part of #161 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/160#issuecomment-282279690___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Error if a macro in a comment is expanded to multiple lines (#124)

While there is a real issue here. The proposed solution is not quite right. Making commenting out a multiline macro illegal is kida silly. Still this need some solution. We opened #158 for discussing this issue and to come up with a better solution. Still thank you very much for your work and

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Error if a macro in a comment is expanded to multiple lines (#124)

Closed #124. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/124#event-975979205___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] implement rpmbuild --changelog=FILE support (#69)

I really don't see the point of this when one could just add the file as a source. Yes, may be you need one more line in the spec but then you do not have one more special thing. There may be a legitimate need for a mechanism to allow using files from the build root that are not available at

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] implement rpmbuild --changelog=FILE support (#69)

Closed #69. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/69#event-976000682___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] initial embedded python interpreter support (@rpm5.org derived) (#25)

Closed #25. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/25#event-975970213___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] reimplement embedded python interpreter support in a cleaner fashion (#96)

Closed #96. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/96#event-975970943___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] reimplement embedded python interpreter support in a cleaner fashion (#96)

See #25 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/96#issuecomment-282281248___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] initial embedded python interpreter support (@rpm5.org derived) (#25)

I really don't see us add Python as part of the spec file language. The trend is rather to reduce dependencies. Also it raises the whole "What version of Python?" question which was deliberately avoided by using lua. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Metatags (#107)

As long as high end tools cannot be sure that the data they are looking at are actually the ones they are interested in but some random, similar looking data added for a completely different purpose, this is of no use. Closing. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Metatags (#107)

Closed #107. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/107#event-976010362___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] add brp helper scripts from mandriva's spec-helper (#122)

On 24 February 2017 at 11:32, Panu Matilainen wrote: > I've nothing against adding more brp-scripts as such, I haven't looked at > this in any detail but there seems to be useful stuff in there. > > Enabling such a big pile of new stuff by default is a wholly different

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] dependency generation doesn't work with rich dependencies (#167)

``` error: invalid dependency (bad format): (crate(spin) >= 0.4.0 with crate(spin) < 0.5.0) ``` I know that `with` is not something what RPM supports, but I suspect that any other rich dep will cause same error. RPM is 4.13.0.1. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM fails to parse rich dependencies returned by dependency generator (#167)

`parseDep()` from `build/rpmfc.c` does it's own parser, so I think if I will reuse `rpmrichParse()` from `lib/rpmds.h`, we will construct full string, then pass constructed information to `rpmdsSinglePool()` and finally call `rpmfcAddFileDep()` on newly created rpmds. I suppose this should